caneman wrote:Michele B wrote:Poonwalker wrote:
Look at the forecasting of Ian or better yet Charley. They often leave it as is. Partly because it’s difficult to ascertain true moment vs a wobble. That is where forecasting error percentages are reported after the fact. They did try to change the cone and keep people informed that the impacts are not represented by such. I think this one is going to surprise people because it’s truly going to be a flood event for many.
But I don't feel they've "misrepresented" anything (not your words, but just saying) with their forecast.
THey've been showing that graphic that shows many inches of rain (up to 20" or so) in some areas. Maybe not high enough totals, though, I'll grant you that.
We are in DeSoto County and we've had several good squalls throughout the day and each one probably laid down 2-3 inches of rain. Still coming down right now, as a matter of fact.
Based on local radar I'm watching, I expect we'll see maybe one or two smaller squalls before this thing clears out of our area entirely.
Nobody said anything about mis representing. It's well within the cone. PLEASE don't re-write words or twist words.
Wasn't trying to do that.
I said those were my words. Sorry if that sounded harsh or negative. Not intending that at all. It's just that it can seem as though they don't get enough (or maybe I mean accurate) information out soon enough.
Sorry, I'm not explaining it clearly enough.
I should just apologize and quit now!

