NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1081 Postby Hurrilurker » Sun Oct 26, 2025 6:56 pm

Beef Stew wrote:Melissa has an absurdly perfect satellite presentation for a sub category 5 storm (at least as of now).

Yeah I'm honestly surprised the pressure isn't lower with that presentation.
1 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1082 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:01 pm

Eyewall diameter is reported as 15nm now

F. CLOSED
G. C15
0 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2106
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1083 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:04 pm

Travorum wrote:Eyewall diameter is reported as 15nm now

F. CLOSED
G. C15

Looks like a successful eyewall meld
3 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6210
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1084 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:10 pm

Wow that is a hell of a tower that just fired off in the western eyewall. So much for an asymmetrical cdo.
7 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2502
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1085 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:10 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
Travorum wrote:Eyewall diameter is reported as 15nm now

F. CLOSED
G. C15

Looks like a successful eyewall meld

...and it happened pretty quickly too
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 230
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1086 Postby sasha_B » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:10 pm

With the new convection over the apparently weak western eyewall, and the eyewall merge apparently successful, I'm wondering if we'll get to see the satellite presentation improve even further tonight. ADT was giving instantaneous T#s of 7.5-7.7 quite frequently towards the end of Melissa's initial ERI, but I think we'd need to see much colder cloud tops in the CDO for that to happen again.
3 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3618
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1087 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:15 pm

Besides the continued mismatch between satellite-based estimates and true intensity, it remains bizarre how Melissa's continued pressure drops aren't translating to wind speed (as of now).

But if we assume that it just completed an eyewall meld, especially given the larger eye and the new, impressive hot tower to the west... Perhaps the wind will catch up very soon?

Image
5 likes   

User avatar
Beef Stew
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 11:31 am
Location: South Florida

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1088 Postby Beef Stew » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:22 pm

Have to think that with that newest burst of convection on the western eye wall and the lack of a pronounced double wind maxima, Melissa is almost inevitably due to strengthen at some point and have her windspeeds and MSLP come closer to matching her structure.
1 likes   

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 454
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1089 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:25 pm

I know these waters are warm and deep at this time of year but I wonder if we’ll start to see upwelling before landfall.
2 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
Beef Stew
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 11:31 am
Location: South Florida

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1090 Postby Beef Stew » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:27 pm

Should be getting another center pass soon
2 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3969
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1091 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:35 pm

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:I know these waters are warm and deep at this time of year but I wonder if we’ll start to see upwelling before landfall.


Doubtful. She would have to basically park in one spot for days for upwelling to become an issue for her. The water is that warm.
4 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Beef Stew
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 11:31 am
Location: South Florida

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1092 Postby Beef Stew » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:36 pm

NE to SW pass coming up any minute now
1 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1093 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:37 pm

931.7mb extrap, down about 1mb from last pass so the rate of deepening is levelling out. Winds aren't particularly different from earlier, 128kt FL winds in the NE.
1 likes   

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1094 Postby Fancy1002 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:43 pm

Does it look like they missed the eye?
1 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8976
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1095 Postby aspen » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:46 pm

This is the most Cat 5-looking non-Cat 5 I’ve ever seen lol. You’d think it’s like 10 mb deeper than it actually is. Really curious as to why it exhibits the classic Cat 5 structural hallmarks despite falling short in actual intensity. This could also have implications for some of the upper-end Cat 4s with speculated Cat 5 status.
6 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3618
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1096 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:53 pm

aspen wrote:This is the most Cat 5-looking non-Cat 5 I’ve ever seen lol. You’d think it’s like 10 mb deeper than it actually is. Really curious as to why it exhibits the classic Cat 5 structural hallmarks despite falling short in actual intensity. This could also have implications for some of the upper-end Cat 4s with speculated Cat 5 status.

It's possible that Melissa was just an anomaly. But if we think there's a systematic pattern of "Dvorak but not actual Cat 5s" (for which there's little concrete evidence), then I'd say it affects EPAC even more than the Atlantic. Most borderline Cat 4/5s in the Atlantic had recon coverage at the peak, with Lorenzo and Humberto among the few exceptions that I can think of (and arguably Sam which already started collapsing when recon got there).
2 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1097 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Sun Oct 26, 2025 7:58 pm

I remember when we all thought Eta was sub-900 nuclear Category 5 and it was actually like in the 930s. This reminds me of that a bit.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1446
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1098 Postby Ubuntwo » Sun Oct 26, 2025 8:00 pm

aspen wrote:This is the most Cat 5-looking non-Cat 5 I’ve ever seen lol. You’d think it’s like 10 mb deeper than it actually is. Really curious as to why it exhibits the classic Cat 5 structural hallmarks despite falling short in actual intensity. This could also have implications for some of the upper-end Cat 4s with speculated Cat 5 status.

It makes sense here - this is the Caribbean in late season. Dvorak is overreliant on convective depth, so a high tropopause can cause overestimates in intensity. Eta's a great extreme example. This is the same reason open Atlantic 130kt+ systems (Sam, Fiona, Jose, Kirk etc) struggle so hard to hit T7.0. I think we've come to recognize here that eye warmth, roundness, and stability plus CDO smoothness are better indicators of extreme intensity. Melissa did briefly have a near-perfect eye, but its CDO has yet to transition past the bursting phase, at least consistently.
6 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

michelinj
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1099 Postby michelinj » Sun Oct 26, 2025 8:01 pm

aspen wrote:This is the most Cat 5-looking non-Cat 5 I’ve ever seen lol. You’d think it’s like 10 mb deeper than it actually is. Really curious as to why it exhibits the classic Cat 5 structural hallmarks despite falling short in actual intensity. This could also have implications for some of the upper-end Cat 4s with speculated Cat 5 status.


My thinking is that this is similar to what we saw with Eta in 2020 which had super-cold cloud tops and incredible satellite presentation and then recon arrived to find a low-mid level cat4. These late season storms can be misleading due to the extra cold cloud tops. I suspect we’re seeing the same again.

Just because we’ve had lots of cat5s lately doesn’t mean that to get that strong a storm doesn’t need to be pretty much PERFECT, and I wouldn’t say Melissa has looked like that yet. Cold CDO? Yes. Warm eye? Yes. But we had something going on in the west eye wall earlier, and even now the eye is slightly misshapen as if some eyewall process is still ongoing. Not saying she won’t get there though…
2 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2554
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1100 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 8:02 pm

The radar loop makes it look like it's wobbling wsw
Image
2 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: KirbyDude25, WaveBreaking and 140 guests