NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion Update= 5 AM Advisory= Up to Category 5

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3971
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1141 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:55 pm

Hurricane2022 wrote:HELL HOW this is NOT a C5??? :spam:
https://i.imgur.com/WbtIV0v.png


As someone who lives about a mile from the Atlantic coast, I could not imagine having that thing sitting right off shore. Unreal, such a beast of a storm just cruising parallel to the Jamaican coast for now as it intensifies.
5 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1142 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:56 pm

Ohh I hate this hurricane so much!! Praying for Jamaica and Cuba!!
 https://x.com/Sekai_WX/status/1982642118754779176

1 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1143 Postby Fancy1002 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:56 pm

Thank pinky ring is quite menacing.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormgodess
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1144 Postby Stormgodess » Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:57 pm

cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.


Noob question:

Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?

I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.

But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.

Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1145 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 9:58 pm

Tons of lightning around the eye all of a sudden

Image
3 likes   

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1146 Postby Fancy1002 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:00 pm

I swear it feels like these hurricanes know when to time their bursts of intensity in between recon planes. As soon as the mission finishes, Melissa starts to explode with a perfect pink ring.
4 likes   

ATDoel
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:02 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1147 Postby ATDoel » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:00 pm

I’m surprised no one has mentioned its forward speed(or lack of) as one of the factors why the wind speed is relatively low. A hurricanes stronger side is the side with a positive movement vector, the movement of the storm adds to the windspeed. If Melissa was moving 15 MPH, it would likely be a cat 5.
2 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3971
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1148 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:01 pm

A lot of deep red wrapping around the northern eyewall now on radar.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 675
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1149 Postby WaveBreaking » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:01 pm

:double:

Image
6 likes   
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1150 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:01 pm

There's no mention of any sort of ERC in the 03z advisory, meld or otherwise, completed or not. As for the SW motion over the past few hours, the NHC thinks this won't have a significant impact on track in the long run:

Although the eye wobbled a bit to the south recently, this is
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.


They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.

A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft has been
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1151 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:03 pm

Hot take: another phase of ERI may have just started.
:froze: :onfire:
 https://x.com/MichaelRLowry/status/1982643194988052600

4 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3971
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1152 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:04 pm

Stormgodess wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.


Noob question:

Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?

I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.

But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.

Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.


I'm sure the equipment is calibrated before and after every flight but it's quite a rough ride going into storms like this so equipment failure is always a real probability.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1153 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:04 pm

WaveBreaking wrote::double:

https://i.imgur.com/bPj86Np.gif


That uh, that escalated quickly.
2 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6211
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1154 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:05 pm

Stormgodess wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.


Noob question:

Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?

I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.

But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.

Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.

I can’t speak for the mods, but I don’t think this is an unreasonable question that would require removal.

That said, I’m confident that if the equipment on these flights were miscalibrated, there would be distinct signs. Considering that there are often two planes simultaneously flying through this storm, each dropping dropsondes, you would see notable discrepancies between the plane readings and their respective dropsondes as they overlap each other’s territory. None of that has been seen in any flights in this storm’s existence though.
3 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1155 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:06 pm

Melissa is over 90 degree F (32 C) water right now, may be partly why it's blowing up so much right now. (Lightning around the core is off the charts right now)
Image
7 likes   

Keldeo1997
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 673
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1156 Postby Keldeo1997 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:11 pm

Image

Holy
11 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148138
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1157 Postby cycloneye » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:13 pm

Who is going to stay up and post the overnight Air Force mission? Maybe an historic one?

https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 0#p3144680
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3622
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1158 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:13 pm

I've been watching Melissa the whole day, but of course it started flexing a full -80C/CDG ring just when I went away for half an hour. If the next recon still finds nothing above 125 kt... I'd be speechless.

ATDoel wrote:I’m surprised no one has mentioned its forward speed(or lack of) as one of the factors why the wind speed is relatively low. A hurricanes stronger side is the side with a positive movement vector, the movement of the storm adds to the windspeed. If Melissa was moving 15 MPH, it would likely be a cat 5.

This explains the wind speed but not the pressure, though.

Travorum wrote:There's no mention of any sort of ERC in the 03z advisory, meld or otherwise, completed or not. As for the SW motion over the past few hours, the NHC thinks this won't have a significant impact on track in the long run:

Although the eye wobbled a bit to the south recently, this is
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.


They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.

A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft has been
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt

My guess is that NHC didn't want to explicitly lower the intensity given the landfall threat. In the TCR, I suspect that both the initial Cat 4 upgrade (where the 120 kt was solely based on satellite) and the intensity since the "unofficial eyewall meld" would be lowered.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Last edited by Teban54 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4240
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1159 Postby Category5Kaiju » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:14 pm

Looks like Melissa’s about to make a real sprint towards Category 5 now.
4 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
Stormgodess
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1160 Postby Stormgodess » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:14 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
Stormgodess wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.


Noob question:

Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?

I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.

But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.

Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.

I can’t speak for the mods, but I don’t think this is an unreasonable question that would require removal.

That said, I’m confident that if the equipment on these flights were miscalibrated, there would be distinct signs. Considering that there are often two planes simultaneously flying through this storm, each dropping dropsondes, you would see notable discrepancies between the plane readings and their respective dropsondes as they overlap each other’s territory. None of that has been seen in any flights in this storm’s existence though.


Thank you to you and eastcoast both. Not having the first clue of how this type of equipment is calibrated/maintained, how difficult, or what the cost is... I just wasnt sure.

And yes I can see how having the second dataset from another plane to compare against, would be helpful. I had never thought of that.

Thank you both so much :D
4 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abajan, cycloneye, Wein and 266 guests