NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.
3 likes
-
MarioProtVI
- Category 5

- Posts: 1032
- Age: 24
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Travorum wrote:Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?
I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.
NHC has thrown out SFMRs beginning last year in high end hurricanes because of its faulty issues so they’re only going by the FL->surface reduction method. It doesn’t matter if satellite estimates think it’s a 5, recon weighs much more over that, and recon supports at most 135 kt. Basically this is just Eta 2.0.
0 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 5121
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.
1 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3962
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
MarioProtVI wrote:Travorum wrote:Teban54 wrote:With such a huge discrepancy in FL and SFMR winds, as well as continued skepticism of SFMR at higher ends... Will the 159 kt SFMR be thrown out completely?
I think maybe not completely disregarded but maybe weighted less; between the CI# 8.1 ADT, the T7.5 subjective fix that will probably come through at 06z, the FL winds, and the SFMR measurement, there's probably enough support for at least 140kts.
NHC has thrown out SFMRs beginning last year in high end hurricanes because of its faulty issues so they’re only going by the FL->surface reduction method. It doesn’t matter if satellite estimates think it’s a 5, recon weighs much more over that, and recon supports at most 135 kt. Basically this is just Eta 2.0.
They badly need to recalibrate the algorithm for the ADT.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ElectricStorm wrote:I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.
Pressure is likely around 922 mb from what I could see.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.
So would it be correct to assume that it will be category five by morning, as long as there aren’t any additional surprises like an Eyewall replacement cycle.
0 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Fancy1002 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:I'd go with 135 kt for the intensity. Very little weight on the SFMR, but the FL winds and pressure drop support a higher intensity.
So would it be correct to assume that it will be category five by morning, as long as there aren’t any additional surprises like an Eyewall replacement cycle.
Most likely. The pressure seems to be falling again at a good rate.
2 likes
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 709
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Eye’s been having some noticeable trochoidal oscillation recently
0 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5

- Posts: 6242
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ElectricStorm wrote:I also agree with 135kts being a good estimate, and with no double wind max this is well on its way to 140kts+ very soon unless something drastically changes.
Since the northern quadrant hasn’t been sampled yet, there’s a chance it already does have 140kt winds.
1 likes
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3962
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
-90 cloudtops are exploding on the eastern sector of the CDO.
could this be a precursor to EWRC?

could this be a precursor to EWRC?

2 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
mrbagyo wrote:-90 cloudtops are exploding on the eastern sector of the CDO.
could this be a precursor to EWRC?
https://s12.gifyu.com/images/b3Qu3.gif
Doubtful. It appeared to go through a pseudo-EWRC today and I don't think it has anything concentric?
1 likes
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
In general, the SFMR should have little weight around 130 kt and up, and thrown out completely around 150 kt and up. I'd want to see a flight-level wind of at least 150 kt before going cat 5, or a dropsonde suggesting such.
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
6 likes
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 709
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Latest dropsonde shows RH is still high in the eye, so if there is any EWRC trying to start, then it probably won’t happen anytime soon.
3 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
The last frame has the eye entirely filled with thunderstorms...


8 likes
TC naming lists: retirements and intensity
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
Most aggressive Advisory #1's in North Atlantic (cr. kevin for starting the list)
-
Chris_in_Tampa
- Category 5

- Posts: 5101
- Age: 42
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Teban54 wrote:The last frame has the eye entirely filled with thunderstorms...
https://i.imgur.com/tvw7XOs.gif
Those are lightning flashes. (It means it's really strengthening basically)
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Teban54 wrote:The last frame has the eye entirely filled with thunderstorms...
https://i.imgur.com/tvw7XOs.gif
Those are lightning flashes. (It means it's really strengthening basically)
That or, a dozen small ships and all of the drunk-off-their-ass passengers caught in the eye and throwing a Rave.
6 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34308
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Teban54 wrote:The last frame has the eye entirely filled with thunderstorms...
https://i.imgur.com/tvw7XOs.gif
Those are lightning flashes. (It means it's really strengthening basically)
That or, a dozen small ships and all of the drunk-off-their-ass passengers caught in the eye and throwing a Rave.
Like the SS Phemius in the 1932 hurricane? (The one that measured 915 mb outside the eye in brutal winds and survived to tell about it)
2 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:chaser1 wrote:Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Those are lightning flashes. (It means it's really strengthening basically)
That or, a dozen small ships and all of the drunk-off-their-ass passengers caught in the eye and throwing a Rave.
Like the SS Phemius in the 1932 hurricane? (The one that measured 915 mb outside the eye in brutal winds and survived to tell about it)
Are you serious? I never heard of that event.
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
There simply are NO amount of exotic mushrooms that could shake that level of PTSD which those folks developed following an experience like that 

1 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
6z Best Track:
AL, 13, 2025102706, , BEST, 0, 163N, 777W, 130, 924, HU...
3 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests






