NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34217
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1641 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:14 pm

Woofde wrote:
aspen wrote:
Teban54 wrote:The IR (especially its last few frames) do almost look like an EWRC, although that can sometimes be deceiving.

https://i.imgur.com/4HGlter.gif

I think it’s probably another meld. Radar does still show some concentric outer bands, and the 12z HAFS models predict a meld/very brief EWRC before it unfortunately strengthens again into landfall.
If 12z HAFS are to be believed this is likely peaking right now, the meld slows it down a touch afterwards. Very easily could be <900mb, 165kts and we will have no recon to catch it until after its peaks. The current IR presentation does make the theory believable.


If it has intensified more, which satellite suggests, I'd go with 155 kt and 900 mb for the advisory.
6 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1642 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:17 pm

Tireman4 wrote:
Hurricane Mike wrote:Yeah, I think Melissa is still deepening. Just a violent hurricane. 11am NHC discussion said the NOAA aircraft had to bail out earlier because of the extreme turbulence.




I wonder, thinking out loud, when the last time that has happened.



Not the plane turning back, but I seem to recall turbulence was so horrible during a flight into Ian (I think it was Ian) that some of the crew actually got physically sick!
7 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 780
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1643 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:19 pm

This is truly stunning. The high-end model forecasts are coming to fruition whether Melissa ultimately goes sub-900 or not.
2 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 247
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1644 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:19 pm

It's possible - if not particularly likely - that this current "peak" (if that's what it is) will hold until recon arrives, or at least until just before. It'll be a while yet, but Melissa's structure has shown itself to be remarkably resilient so far.
3 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9362
Age: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1645 Postby Iceresistance » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:23 pm

sasha_B wrote:It's possible - if not particularly likely - that this current "peak" (if that's what it is) will hold until recon arrives, or at least until just before. It'll be a while yet, but Melissa's structure has shown itself to be remarkably resilient so far.

What makes it even more insane is the fact that all the wind shear did was just make the inner eyewall stronger and prevent true EWRCs, just eyewall melds instead
10 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1646 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:24 pm

galaxy401 wrote:Needs to pass 905 mb to reach the top 10 most intense Atlantic hurricanes. Hugging the threshold now.


Wouldn't surprise me if this one did it.
4 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1647 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:28 pm

Iceresistance wrote:
sasha_B wrote:It's possible - if not particularly likely - that this current "peak" (if that's what it is) will hold until recon arrives, or at least until just before. It'll be a while yet, but Melissa's structure has shown itself to be remarkably resilient so far.

What makes it even more insane is the fact that all the wind shear did was just make the inner eyewall stronger and prevent true EWRCs, just eyewall melds instead

Slightly off-topic question: Did something similar happen to Irma? I wasn't tracking storms in 2017, but I recall Irma being one of the most well-known examples of intense storms that never (or rarely) went through a true EWRC in favor of repeated eyewall melds. Was shear a contributing factor there too?
3 likes   

User avatar
storm_in_a_teacup
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 483
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama (originally from Houston)
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1648 Postby storm_in_a_teacup » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:29 pm



Holy crap I thought the birds made it into the eye. Guess they did not.

It seems the hurricanes don’t just eat warm seawater… :eek:
4 likes   
I know I can't straddle the atmosphere...just a tiny storm in your teacup, girl.

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10245
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1649 Postby Blown Away » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:30 pm

Image
Melissa continues moving W of the NHC track...
6 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2239
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1650 Postby Kazmit » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:30 pm

CDO perfection.

Image
17 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1651 Postby WaveBreaking » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:32 pm

One of the most violent CDOs I’ve ever seen, even more so than Jova’s.

Image
13 likes   
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

skillz305
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 11:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida --> Vero Beach, Florida

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1652 Postby skillz305 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:34 pm

Just came by to say I’m praying for Jamaica.

:flag:
8 likes   
:flag:Hurricanes: Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Katrina 2005 - Wilma 2005 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1879
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1653 Postby Hurricane2022 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:35 pm

WaveBreaking wrote:One of the most violent CDOs I’ve ever seen, even more so than Jova’s.

https://i.imgur.com/rT4cxPC.gif

Even the gravity waves are becoming too violent now :roll: :lol:
Last edited by Hurricane2022 on Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

ATDoel
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:02 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1654 Postby ATDoel » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:36 pm

WaveBreaking wrote:One of the most violent CDOs I’ve ever seen, even more so than Jova’s.

https://i.imgur.com/rT4cxPC.gif


That inner core is nuts, looks like it's at 2x framerate.
5 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1655 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:37 pm




:double:

Wow. Danger on top of danger....There may be nothing left of the island after this thing passes.

:(
4 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

User avatar
storm_in_a_teacup
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 483
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama (originally from Houston)
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1656 Postby storm_in_a_teacup » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:38 pm

USTropics wrote:There are a lot of questions on how deep can Melissa get, or in other words what is the theoretical minimum pressure that this system can achieve. The answer is called maximum potential intensity (MPI). This is quite literally the most dangerous part of the Atlantic ocean in terms of MPI due to the sea surface temperatures (and the depth it goes to). Melissa could park over this region for days, and it would not upwell cooler waters:

https://i.imgur.com/iU4gpjr.gif

If you want to know the exact details (it's a bit of a read), but here is a post I made a while ago that outlines the mechanics of a hurricane and how to calculate MPI.

Determining the maximum wind speed a tropical cyclone can reach involves applying some thermodynamics, namely we model the mechanisms of a tropical cyclone as a Carnot heat engine (not too dissimilar from a motor/car engine). This allows us to determine the MPI (maximum potential intensity) as others have mentioned by using the Carnot cycle. But what exactly is a Carnot cycle and how does this physically look?

The Carnot cycle is characterized by four stages of expansion and compression. I created a crude diagram below to better show these stages in a cross-section of a mature hurricane:
The first stage (A→B) is isothermal expansion. In this stage, air flows inward towards the low pressure center for the storm.
The second stage (B→C) is adiabatic expansion. Air begins to rise adiabatically up the eyewall to the top of the atmosphere (TOA).
The third stage (C→D) is isothermal compression. Air now flows outward at this point and radiative cooling begins.
The fourth stage (D→A) is adiabatic compression, as air now sinks and begins to warm. Pressure increases, and the cycle begins again.

https://i.imgur.com/1UYbPBt.jpeg

Now that we can identify the inner mechanisms of a hurricane, what are we really trying to show here? First, we now know the ocean-hurricane interaction provides the fuel pump, and as a hurricane intensifies, a feedback loop begins. As wind speeds begin to increase, this also increases the evaporation rate, which in turn increases the latent heat supply that drives our Carnot engine.

Secondly, we can now apply some math equations to quantify what this value is. From our previous statement, we know our main source of latent heat/warm reservoir is our sea surface temperatures (i.e., through the evaporation process, latent heat is released). If we also treat our TOA as the outflow (think cool reservoir), we can now mathematically model a hurricane using the Carnot efficiency ratio. Skipping some of the setup using the First Law of Thermodynamics and determining work done for each leg of the cycle, we arrive at our most simplified equation:

https://i.imgur.com/ZwQOzhG.png

Where Ts is our inflow surface temperature of the ocean (hot reservoir), To is our TOA outflow temperature (cold reservoir), and E is a ratio of enthalpy and surface drag (i.e., heat exchange coefficients). In this sense, we can state the mechanical energy produced by our heat engine (V, or work done) is the energy of the winds (hurricane intensity)!

If we consider E to be constant (not the safest assumption, but will do for now), our maximum potential intensity, as stated by thermodynamics, is simply governed by the outflow temperature and the inflow temperature. In other words, this means changes in our cloud top convection or sea surface temperature strictly dictates the maximum wind speeds a tropical cyclone can reach.

With all that said, it’s important to note that we’re discussing the theoretical maximum potential intensity. Cyclones rarely reach this intensity because this requires ideal atmosphere and oceanic conditions—in other words, environmental factors rarely allow a system to reach MPI. This includes
Land interaction: this obviously removes our fuel source (latent heat release from the ocean surface)
Vertical wind shear: This causes the cyclones core to become asymmetrical, weakening the convective pattern or even creating an absence of convection on the upshear side of the cyclone (this raises our To)
Ocean interaction: As stated previously, increased wind speed can increase evaporation, but too much wind speed over a very specific area of the ocean can also cause upwelling. This localized cooling of the ocean layer decreases our Ts variable.
Dry air entrainment: If our adiabatic cooling/expansion leg of the cycle becomes disrupted by dry air, this decreases the convective potential of our cyclone and To.


She’s just having the smorgasbord of a lifetime :eek:
0 likes   
I know I can't straddle the atmosphere...just a tiny storm in your teacup, girl.

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9009
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1657 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:40 pm

Woofde wrote:
aspen wrote:
Teban54 wrote:The IR (especially its last few frames) do almost look like an EWRC, although that can sometimes be deceiving.

https://i.imgur.com/4HGlter.gif

I think it’s probably another meld. Radar does still show some concentric outer bands, and the 12z HAFS models predict a meld/very brief EWRC before it unfortunately strengthens again into landfall.
If 12z HAFS are to be believed this is likely peaking right now, the meld slows it down a touch afterwards. Very easily could be <900mb, 165kts and we will have no recon to catch it until after its peaks. The current IR presentation does make the theory believable.

We probably already have enough data to extrapolate to such a peak (or something close to it). This includes:
—Pressure dropping by about 1-2mb per pass.
—FL of 160 kt, SFMR of 160-170 kt.
—Eyewall dropsondes recording 155-165 kt surface winds, including a 163 kt drop in the NE eyewall at 15:44z.
—Winds in the lower 150m of the NE eyewall averaging to 185 kt, with a 90% reduction yielding 166.5 kt.
—Extreme subsidence in the eye indicating effective transfer of winds to the surface, plus eyewall drops to support this.
—Continued lightning in the eyewall, with signs of a meld starting to show up around 18:00-18:30z.

Together, I believe this could support 903-905 mbar and 160 kt at 18z. A case could be made for 165 kt, but we probably needed another NE pass to verify those insane <150m wind measurements and just how well they’re transferring to the surface. Additionally, pressure falls looked to be slowing during the last few passes, so with the signs of a potential meld, it’s possible Melissa’s deepening has temporarily halted.
Last edited by aspen on Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11919
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1658 Postby GCANE » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:41 pm

1 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1659 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:44 pm

michelinj wrote:I do think some eyewall replacement cycle is starting or occurring. The last few frames on imagery just show the CDO not as smooth as before. It would also fit in with the last eye drop just being a fraction drier. Whether it's another merger or a full cycle I'm not sure. Recon a while ago didn't show any double wind maxima so if so then it's come on rather quickly. Radar doesn't have much of a moat either so perhaps more merger than replacement.

If an EWRC of sorts is happening then could be a crucial few hours for Jamaica. Have seen it before where a little dry air or shear at just the wrong time when a storm is vulnerable mid-EWRC and it can really weaken a system. On the other hand a successful cycle and the wind field will expand, bringing some pretty populated areas within reach of stronger winds, and with ample time to strengthen further.

So not saying an EWRC is definitely happening, but certainly a change of some kind on IR imagery atm.



"When a storm is making a turn, the eye will change shape....sort of signalling the direction it's going to turn...." John Hope
2 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1660 Postby Category5Kaiju » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:44 pm

I'm genuinely alarmed at how well Melissa is maintaining the violent CDO and well-defined eye. By now most storms of such strength would've started to experience signs of an EWRC or weakening, but nope. Melissa seems to be an exception to that general behavioral pattern.
8 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], kevin and 109 guests