NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1621 Postby WaveBreaking » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:52 pm

Image
10 likes   
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

michelinj
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1622 Postby michelinj » Mon Oct 27, 2025 1:55 pm

I do think some eyewall replacement cycle is starting or occurring. The last few frames on imagery just show the CDO not as smooth as before. It would also fit in with the last eye drop just being a fraction drier. Whether it's another merger or a full cycle I'm not sure. Recon a while ago didn't show any double wind maxima so if so then it's come on rather quickly. Radar doesn't have much of a moat either so perhaps more merger than replacement.

If an EWRC of sorts is happening then could be a crucial few hours for Jamaica. Have seen it before where a little dry air or shear at just the wrong time when a storm is vulnerable mid-EWRC and it can really weaken a system. On the other hand a successful cycle and the wind field will expand, bringing some pretty populated areas within reach of stronger winds, and with ample time to strengthen further.

So not saying an EWRC is definitely happening, but certainly a change of some kind on IR imagery atm.
1 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 623
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1623 Postby Travorum » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:01 pm

WaveBreaking wrote:
rwfromkansas wrote:
WaveBreaking wrote:
A GOES-19 mesoscale sector that just got switched from looking at the US Northeast to Hurricane Melissa.


Why did they move the one that was there? That seems crazy in the middle of this major event. I was on the other one and it suddenly jumped to the East Coast.


I'm not sure tbh. Never found out how they decide where a meso sector should be. I think NOAA workers can request a meso sector to image a specific place.


I looked back at the OSPO alerts, it seems like it was just a cascading effect that only resolved now. Back when the NHC originally requested the mesoscale sector the SPC had requested a mesocale sector half an hour before, so they got assigned sector 1 and the NHC got sector 2. This is the first time since then that sector 1 was unassigned, so they put sector 2 back in its default position and assigned sector 1 to the NHC.

You can see OSPO alerts for both GOES satellites here, they show mesoscale schedules, outages, and assignments for the other instruments:
https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/messages/2025/2025-10-include.html
1 likes   

User avatar
InfernoFlameCat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2127
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:52 am
Location: Buford, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1624 Postby InfernoFlameCat » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:02 pm

michelinj wrote:I do think some eyewall replacement cycle is starting or occurring. The last few frames on imagery just show the CDO not as smooth as before. It would also fit in with the last eye drop just being a fraction drier. Whether it's another merger or a full cycle I'm not sure. Recon a while ago didn't show any double wind maxima so if so then it's come on rather quickly. Radar doesn't have much of a moat either so perhaps more merger
If an EWRC of sorts is happening then could be a crucial few hours for Jamaica. Have seen it before where a little dry air or shear at just the wrong time when a storm is vulnerable mid-EWRC and it can really weaken a system. On the other hand a successful cycle and the wind field will expand, bringing some pretty populated areas within reach of stronger winds, and with ample time to strengthen further.

So not saying an EWRC is definitely happening, but certainly a change of some kind on IR imagery atm.

Unfortunately radar shows no such thing
7 likes   
I am by no means a professional. DO NOT look at my forecasts for official information or make decisions based on what I post.

Goal: to become a registered expert over tropical and subtropical cyclones.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 12072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1625 Postby GCANE » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:03 pm

1 likes   

User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1626 Postby WaveBreaking » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:04 pm

Image
2 likes   

I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1627 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:04 pm

The IR (especially its last few frames) do almost look like an EWRC, although that can sometimes be deceiving.

Image
4 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5444
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1628 Postby Nimbus » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:06 pm

ATDoel wrote:
kevin wrote:With every video coming from Jamaica & many people deciding not to evacuate to a shelter, I'm getting more afraid we're looking at a disaster in the making. The strongest hurricane to ever make landfall on the island was Gilbert at 115 kt. There is a good chance that Melissa will make landfall at 140 - 160 kt. On top of that an estimated 25+ inches of rain will fall on a large portion of the island.

I hope it's because there's still a decent amount of time to get to a shelter and they likely don't have far to go. Staying in a shelter for 2 days sounds horrible. Also it isn't like the states where you can hop on the interstate and drive a couple hundred miles away from a storm, so they're pretty stuck in the local area.


The topography of Kingston makes it safer to shelter in place.
There are many areas within a few blocks of the bay that are above 100 feet that have good drainage and never flood.
Its areas like the airport that are susceptible to surge.
As long as the core winds keep moving west then north, shelter in place is probably going to work in Kingston.
3 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9042
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1629 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:08 pm

Teban54 wrote:The IR (especially its last few frames) do almost look like an EWRC, although that can sometimes be deceiving.

https://i.imgur.com/4HGlter.gif

I think it’s probably another meld. Radar does still show some concentric outer bands, and the 12z HAFS models predict a meld/very brief EWRC before it unfortunately strengthens again into landfall.
4 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

michelinj
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1630 Postby michelinj » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:09 pm

InfernoFlameCat wrote:
michelinj wrote:I do think some eyewall replacement cycle is starting or occurring. The last few frames on imagery just show the CDO not as smooth as before. It would also fit in with the last eye drop just being a fraction drier. Whether it's another merger or a full cycle I'm not sure. Recon a while ago didn't show any double wind maxima so if so then it's come on rather quickly. Radar doesn't have much of a moat either so perhaps more merger
If an EWRC of sorts is happening then could be a crucial few hours for Jamaica. Have seen it before where a little dry air or shear at just the wrong time when a storm is vulnerable mid-EWRC and it can really weaken a system. On the other hand a successful cycle and the wind field will expand, bringing some pretty populated areas within reach of stronger winds, and with ample time to strengthen further.

So not saying an EWRC is definitely happening, but certainly a change of some kind on IR imagery atm.

Unfortunately radar shows no such thing

Yeah it's difficult to tell, but something different with satellite in the last half hour for sure imo. Some really really cold cloud tops in a perfect ring just away from the eye and some noticeable warming nearest the eye. Could be seeing things though as I've been staring at this imagery all day now!
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1958
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1631 Postby Hurricane2022 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:11 pm

Teban54 wrote:The IR (especially its last few frames) do almost look like an EWRC, although that can sometimes be deceiving.

https://i.imgur.com/4HGlter.gif

She still looks pretty much intact so far IMO.
Image
2 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
Woofde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:33 am

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1632 Postby Woofde » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:13 pm

aspen wrote:
Teban54 wrote:The IR (especially its last few frames) do almost look like an EWRC, although that can sometimes be deceiving.

https://i.imgur.com/4HGlter.gif

I think it’s probably another meld. Radar does still show some concentric outer bands, and the 12z HAFS models predict a meld/very brief EWRC before it unfortunately strengthens again into landfall.
If 12z HAFS are to be believed this is likely peaking right now, the meld slows it down a touch afterwards. Very easily could be <900mb, 165kts and we will have no recon to catch it until after its peaks. The current IR presentation does make the theory believable.
6 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34308
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1633 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:14 pm

Woofde wrote:
aspen wrote:
Teban54 wrote:The IR (especially its last few frames) do almost look like an EWRC, although that can sometimes be deceiving.

https://i.imgur.com/4HGlter.gif

I think it’s probably another meld. Radar does still show some concentric outer bands, and the 12z HAFS models predict a meld/very brief EWRC before it unfortunately strengthens again into landfall.
If 12z HAFS are to be believed this is likely peaking right now, the meld slows it down a touch afterwards. Very easily could be <900mb, 165kts and we will have no recon to catch it until after its peaks. The current IR presentation does make the theory believable.


If it has intensified more, which satellite suggests, I'd go with 155 kt and 900 mb for the advisory.
6 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1128
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1634 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:17 pm

Tireman4 wrote:
Hurricane Mike wrote:Yeah, I think Melissa is still deepening. Just a violent hurricane. 11am NHC discussion said the NOAA aircraft had to bail out earlier because of the extreme turbulence.




I wonder, thinking out loud, when the last time that has happened.



Not the plane turning back, but I seem to recall turbulence was so horrible during a flight into Ian (I think it was Ian) that some of the crew actually got physically sick!
7 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 783
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1635 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:19 pm

This is truly stunning. The high-end model forecasts are coming to fruition whether Melissa ultimately goes sub-900 or not.
2 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

User avatar
sasha_B
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 289
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1636 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:19 pm

It's possible - if not particularly likely - that this current "peak" (if that's what it is) will hold until recon arrives, or at least until just before. It'll be a while yet, but Melissa's structure has shown itself to be remarkably resilient so far.
3 likes   

User avatar
Iceresistance
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9434
Age: 22
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1637 Postby Iceresistance » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:23 pm

sasha_B wrote:It's possible - if not particularly likely - that this current "peak" (if that's what it is) will hold until recon arrives, or at least until just before. It'll be a while yet, but Melissa's structure has shown itself to be remarkably resilient so far.

What makes it even more insane is the fact that all the wind shear did was just make the inner eyewall stronger and prevent true EWRCs, just eyewall melds instead
10 likes   
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020

Winter 2020-2021 :cold:

All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.

Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.

Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information

Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1128
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1638 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:24 pm

galaxy401 wrote:Needs to pass 905 mb to reach the top 10 most intense Atlantic hurricanes. Hugging the threshold now.


Wouldn't surprise me if this one did it.
4 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1639 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:28 pm

Iceresistance wrote:
sasha_B wrote:It's possible - if not particularly likely - that this current "peak" (if that's what it is) will hold until recon arrives, or at least until just before. It'll be a while yet, but Melissa's structure has shown itself to be remarkably resilient so far.

What makes it even more insane is the fact that all the wind shear did was just make the inner eyewall stronger and prevent true EWRCs, just eyewall melds instead

Slightly off-topic question: Did something similar happen to Irma? I wasn't tracking storms in 2017, but I recall Irma being one of the most well-known examples of intense storms that never (or rarely) went through a true EWRC in favor of repeated eyewall melds. Was shear a contributing factor there too?
3 likes   

User avatar
storm_in_a_teacup
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 494
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama (originally from Houston)
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1640 Postby storm_in_a_teacup » Mon Oct 27, 2025 2:29 pm



Holy crap I thought the birds made it into the eye. Guess they did not.

It seems the hurricanes don’t just eat warm seawater… :eek:
4 likes   
I know I can't straddle the atmosphere...just a tiny storm in your teacup, girl.


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests