NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
TheHurricaneGod
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 164
- Age: 22
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2020 6:19 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
That's an over 250 MPH wind gust from a dropsonde!
0 likes
- Extratropical94
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3545
- Age: 30
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Fancy1002 wrote:Extratropical94 wrote:219 knots on the eyewall drop. This is insane
Would that justify an upgrade to 190 or 195?
165kt/190mph would definitely be justifiable with that data. There isn't a single reading below 170 knots in the lowest 100 mb.
8 likes
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards!
Clinching counties, one at a time: https://mob-rule.com/user-gifs/USA/xtrp94.gif
- Daniel
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards!
Clinching counties, one at a time: https://mob-rule.com/user-gifs/USA/xtrp94.gif
- Daniel
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 490
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
michelinj wrote:Fancy1002 wrote:Extratropical94 wrote:219 knots on the eyewall drop. This is insane
Would that justify an upgrade to 190 or 195?
The dropsonde value was aloft not surface. And also those measuremnts are instantaneous. So they can find some even more extreme values than gust speed. Still incomprehensible however.
We know it is a gust and at elevation but it is still (BY FAR) the highest I have ever seen.
1 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
The sickening thing is that, due to Jamaica's high elevation, it's plausible that some of the insane winds and gusts aloft in the dropsonade can actually be realized over land.
Last edited by Teban54 on Tue Oct 28, 2025 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
9 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
The NOAA plane may be leaving now as well.
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Melissa could very well be a 165 kt/190 mph storm...
0 likes
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 490
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
wx98 wrote:The NOAA plane may be leaving now as well.
I wonder if they will say these passes were unsafe.
1 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Fancy1002 wrote:Are both of the planes leaving? I was hoping for 1 last pass.
Given the absolutely insane eyewall and the AF plane's earlier struggles exiting it, it's more than reasonable for both crews to prioritize their safety. I have my utmost respect for them risking their lives to provide invaluable data for meteorology and the mankind.
3 likes
- Category5Kaiju
- Category 5

- Posts: 4259
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
I just broke out in a cold sweat now seeing the update.
Holy f***** s***.
Holy f***** s***.
10 likes
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Well, it looks like that's going to be all all she wrote from recon prior to landfall. Not that it matters for Jamaica, but one more pass could've possibly have had us tying Allen's windspeeds and breaking Labor Day's MSLP. I'm just happy both planes were able to make it in, get this record-breaking data, and make it out in once piece.
Last edited by Beef Stew on Tue Oct 28, 2025 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes
-
Tekken_Guy
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:08 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Is Wilma’s record in jeopardy? Or at least Gilbert’s second place?
1 likes
-
PavelGaborik10
- Category 1

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2018 3:23 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Tekken_Guy wrote:Is Wilma’s record in jeopardy? Or at least Gilbert’s second place?
Planes are leaving, so probably not.
Wilma would be safe, Gilbert was possibly beatable.
Last edited by PavelGaborik10 on Tue Oct 28, 2025 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Tekken_Guy wrote:Is Wilma’s record in jeopardy? Or at least Gilbert’s second place?
Wilma's record is not unless ground obs find something crazy
0 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Tekken_Guy wrote:Is Wilma’s record in jeopardy? Or at least Gilbert’s second place?
Highly unlikely- we'd have to get a ground measurement of sub-888 mb, which is a solid 5 mb lower than the lowest reading recon had. Even if she does continue to deepen right up to a rapidly approaching landfall, the odds of catching that data on the ground are extremely low.
Last edited by Beef Stew on Tue Oct 28, 2025 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
PavelGaborik10 wrote:Tekken_Guy wrote:Is Wilma’s record in jeopardy? Or at least Gilbert’s second place?
Planes are leaving, so probably not.
Wilma would be safe, Gilbert was likely beatable.
We can still get data from ground observers, such as Josh, in the event that Melissa actually deepens below 892 mb or even Gilbert's 888 mb.
Remember, the Labor Day hurricane's 892 mb record came from a ground report.
2 likes
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 490
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Look at these altitude measurements as the AF plane entered the eyewall. 150 meter swings. I've never seen turbulence like that. I bet they bailed because they didn't think the plane would survive another beating like that.


8 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
- WaveBreaking
- Category 2

- Posts: 698
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Location: US
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
I thought Humberto would be the last time I’d wake to to something crazy this season, but nope, today I wake up to history being made. Wishing the best for Jamaica.


4 likes
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
Landfall estimated at 11:30 EDT
4 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5

- Posts: 3463
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion: Update= 185mph/892mb at 10AM
These are some of the scariest recon passes I've ever seen. I can't imagine how bad it is on the ground.
2 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Cdenton12 and 94 guests










