NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
dukeblue219
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 556
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
ljmac75 wrote:zzzh wrote:It should be noted that while Melissa's landfall intensity
is among the strongest ever recorded in the Atlantic basin,
it will take extensive post-analysis to determine exactly
where it ranks among landfalling Atlantic hurricanes.
Too late, the relevant Wikipedia lists have already been adjusted.
In all seriousness, I hope someone somewhere got a pressure reading in the eye.
I think Josh getting a reading on the eastern eyewall should be enough. We can then use the pressure gradient from recon just a few hours prior to work backwards and find the central pressure at landfall with whatever Josh got.
2 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- TeamPlayersBlue
- Category 5

- Posts: 3459
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
- Location: Denver/Applewood, CO
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Amazes me when storms IMMEDIATELY cross back over water, they begin to show signs of life again.
4 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Got to hand it to Lockheed.
They build planes that take a beating and keep on ticking.
They build planes that take a beating and keep on ticking.
3 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1909
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
https://x.com/ameliaUrquhart_/status/1983278839196463130
https://x.com/BackpirchCrew/status/1983279425220411679
https://x.com/BackpirchCrew/status/1983279425220411679
2 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Still looks in good shape.
It'll be interesting to see what the data shows it to be in the next recon pass.
It'll be interesting to see what the data shows it to be in the next recon pass.
1 likes
I'm not a meteorologist, I'm an electronics engineer. While I can probably fix your toaster oven, you're not going to learn about storms from me!
New Mexico had no hurricanes. Then I moved to NC right before Fran.....
New Mexico had no hurricanes. Then I moved to NC right before Fran.....
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 490
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
GCANE wrote:I dunno. 355K PV is still in the clear over a wide area.
Still has the setup for upshear vortex precession.
Over very warm and deep water.
Has all the necessary components except for time.
1 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 490
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
rwfromkansas wrote:they should have stayed until landfall.
Easy there, hotshot. Those g-force limits are for their safety.
4 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
tallywx wrote:Ed_2001 wrote:Nimbus wrote:
38 with 58 at the airport now
28 05:00 E 38 G 54 0.00 Heavy Rain and Windy BKN010 OVC045 77 75.2 94% 78 0 0.0
Then that anemometer is collecting faulty or outdated data. I mean just check out the video tweet to your top.
Timestamp 05:00 local? That was 9 hours ago!
Montego Bay, Saint James, Jamaica Weather Conditions just updated 87 mph from the NW
0 likes
NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Correction: Eye exited Salt Marsh, Jamaica...
Hard eyewall probably exited over Falmouth, Jamaica on its way back over water...
Hard eyewall probably exited over Falmouth, Jamaica on its way back over water...
0 likes
- Hurrilurker
- Category 2

- Posts: 738
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
It's a mess (and disaster) but honestly it could have been a lot worse. If it was going to hit Jamaica, that looks like about the best possible path it could have taken for minimal population impacts.
1 likes
- StormWeather
- Category 1

- Posts: 454
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2024 2:34 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Anyone know what happened to Mission 26? They did a U-turn and went back to the island they took off from.
0 likes
Just an average cyclone tracker
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
-
TomballEd
- Category 5

- Posts: 1066
- Age: 61
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2023 4:52 pm
- Location: Spring/Klein area, not Tomball
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
GCANE wrote:Got to hand it to Lockheed.
They build planes that take a beating and keep on ticking.
They get overhauled every few years and are out of service for the better part of a year (I saw something on Discovery) but the planes are 50 years old. The Navy is phasing out the last of the Orion subhunters in favor the P8 Poseidon (both the Orion and Poseidon are modified civilian aircraft, the Lockheed Electra and the B-737)). NOAA is going to have to start training its own Orion pilots with the Navy retiring the plane.
The WC-130J just looks sturdier to me.
1 likes
-
dukeblue219
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 556
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hurrilurker wrote:It's a mess (and disaster) but honestly it could have been a lot worse. If it was going to hit Jamaica, that looks like about the best possible path it could have taken for minimal population impacts.
It's really hard to tell the day-of, though. Katrina felt the same way - "it's weakening," "it missed New Orleans to the East," "the levees appear to be holding," etc.
9 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
TomballEd wrote:GCANE wrote:Got to hand it to Lockheed.
They build planes that take a beating and keep on ticking.
They get overhauled every few years and are out of service for the better part of a year (I saw something on Discovery) but the planes are 50 years old. The Navy is phasing out the last of the Orion subhunters in favor the P8 Poseidon (both the Orion and Poseidon are modified civilian aircraft, the Lockheed Electra and the B-737)). NOAA is going to have to start training its own Orion pilots with the Navy retiring the plane.
The WC-130J just looks sturdier to me.
C130 is awesome. I was a Flight Test Engineer for Lockheed in my earlier years. Flew on the X130 many times and did many crazy things. X130 was a modified C130 designed for VSTOL. Flew tree top levels in the Smokies and did sonobuoy drops at Pax River. Luckily I got out just before it crashed and burned in Marietta,
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
dukeblue219 wrote:Hurrilurker wrote:It's a mess (and disaster) but honestly it could have been a lot worse. If it was going to hit Jamaica, that looks like about the best possible path it could have taken for minimal population impacts.
It's really hard to tell the day-of, though. Katrina felt the same way - "it's weakening," "it missed New Orleans to the East," "the levees appear to be holding," etc.
Same for Helene. Initial comments after the landfall focused on the Big Bend area itself, which, despite enduring a Cat 4 landfall, was seen as "good luck" by FL landfall standards due to lower population. Even the surge in the Tampa Bay area only caught attention a few hours later. The flooding and destruction much further inland, which eventually became the most well-known impacts of Helene, only started dominating the discussions a day or so after landfall.
As for Melissa, inland flooding already seems to be a theme, even in areas far from the eyewall.
5 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Didn’t have time to post these earlier. Peak intensity/landfall.




Last edited by Kazmit on Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests







