NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34286
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2741 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:34 pm

The easiest hint to see if it is strengthening is if the pressure drops between passes. Until they drop to 10,000 feet, the P-W relationship and dropsondes are the best indicators.
0 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2742 Postby Teban54 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:34 pm

Teban54 wrote:I didn't see the high altitude of the plane earlier when reporting FL winds. Sorry if that misled anyone.

This drop is from the weaker NW eyewall, which still seems to show relatively good mixing down to the surface (as well as high FL/surface ratios).

https://i.postimg.cc/XYXN4c3k/MELISSA-NOAA2-2513A-dropsonde-202510282207.png

Here's the NE eyewall. While definitely not a major anymore, it probably doesn't change anything I said above fundamentally.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2743 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:39 pm

I am not surprised to see Melissa is probably a Category 3 now. Jamaica is pretty mountainous and Melissa wasn't exactly trucking it. If there's any silver lining to the horror that just got unleashed today, it's that Cuba probably isn't facing a Category 5 (hopefully not).
2 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4141
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2744 Postby AJC3 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:40 pm

StormWeather wrote:Anyone know what happened to Mission 26? They did a U-turn and went back to the island they took off from.


Bird strike on takeoff.
1 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5439
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2745 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:41 pm

Teban54 wrote:
Teban54 wrote:I didn't see the high altitude of the plane earlier when reporting FL winds. Sorry if that misled anyone.

This drop is from the weaker NW eyewall, which still seems to show relatively good mixing down to the surface (as well as high FL/surface ratios).

https://i.postimg.cc/XYXN4c3k/MELISSA-NOAA2-2513A-dropsonde-202510282207.png

Here's the NE eyewall. While definitely not a major anymore, it probably doesn't change anything I said above fundamentally.

https://i.postimg.cc/k5dHfqjc/MELISSA-NOAA2-2513A-dropsonde-202510282214.png


Gusts to 60 knots currently being reported for Montego bay so this sounds reasonable.
They can't work on restoring the power lines till the wind subsides.

Cuba may luck out if we can get a little dry air entrained before landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
syfr
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 223
Age: 106
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:33 pm
Location: East Central NC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2746 Postby syfr » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:43 pm

The level of intensity that Jamaica took from Melissa is surprising. Are "perfect" storms like Melissa, particularly vulnerable to severe attenuation , in comparison to your normal run of the mill big blob Cat III or the like?
2 likes   
I'm not a meteorologist, I'm an electronics engineer. While I can probably fix your toaster oven, you're not going to learn about storms from me!

New Mexico had no hurricanes. Then I moved to NC right before Fran.....

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2747 Postby Teban54 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:44 pm

:double:

Image
11 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4141
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2748 Postby AJC3 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:48 pm

syfr wrote:The level of intensity that Jamaica took from Melissa is surprising. Are "perfect" storms like Melissa, particularly vulnerable to severe attenuation , in comparison to your normal run of the mill big blob Cat III or the like?


In spite of its strength and intensity landfall, I think the Melissa's relatively small RMW made it more easily disrupted by the high terrain of Jamaica (even though the higher peaks are on the central-east part of the island).
11 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5439
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2749 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:52 pm

syfr wrote:The level of intensity that Jamaica took from Melissa is surprising. Are "perfect" storms like Melissa, particularly vulnerable to severe attenuation , in comparison to your normal run of the mill big blob Cat III or the like?


Not really, most of the Montego Bay habitation is located on the west side of 1000 foot hills which shields them from high wind observations till they get back out over water. Melissa looks to be coming back some tonight unless the dry air has arrived?
1 likes   

ljmac75
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2023 12:30 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2750 Postby ljmac75 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:55 pm

It looks to me like the NHC went with the standard inland decay rate for Melissa's weakening after landfall (presumably because they have nothing else to go by, this is the first hurricane to take a northward track over the western side of Jamaica in almost 100 years). Works pretty well for the gulf coast, not so well for a rather rugged island.
6 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34286
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2751 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:58 pm

ljmac75 wrote:It looks to me like the NHC went with the standard inland decay rate for Melissa's weakening after landfall (presumably because they have nothing else to go by, this is the first hurricane to take a northward track over the western side of Jamaica in almost 100 years). Works pretty well for the gulf coast, not so well for a rather rugged island.


Maria, which was moving faster and had a larger RMW, dropped from 135 kt to 95 kt in about 4 hours over Puerto Rico. I was thinking that could be a comparison.
6 likes   

User avatar
Beef Stew
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 640
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 11:31 am
Location: South Florida

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2752 Postby Beef Stew » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:59 pm

syfr wrote:The level of intensity that Jamaica took from Melissa is surprising. Are "perfect" storms like Melissa, particularly vulnerable to severe attenuation , in comparison to your normal run of the mill big blob Cat III or the like?


Generally, yes. The way I like to think of it is this: which is going to be an easier repair job if you crash it- a 2005 Ford F150 or a brand new Ferrari?

A category 5, especially an upper echelon one like Melissa, is a highly refined, highly sensitive heat engine. It performs at the highest standards as a cyclone can, but any little perturbation can quickly spiral and cause a huge disruption (think Delta in 2020) that can be difficult to recover from. A run of the mill cat 3, as you mentioned- or certainly a lesser storm- might be more resilient to having its circulation disrupted by land, shear, etc because it doesn’t have to be as efficient, as perfect by nature- that’s why it’s not a C4 or 5.

If circulation can persist, a former category 5 can reintensify at a good pace if conditions are favorable, but after traversing significant elevation it’s never a seamless process.
7 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5439
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2753 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:04 pm

AJC3 wrote:
syfr wrote:The level of intensity that Jamaica took from Melissa is surprising. Are "perfect" storms like Melissa, particularly vulnerable to severe attenuation , in comparison to your normal run of the mill big blob Cat III or the like?


In spite of its strength and intensity landfall, I think the Melissa's relatively small RMW made it more easily disrupted by the high terrain of Jamaica (even though the higher peaks are on the central-east part of the island).


The drier air earlier in Melissas development kept the RMW in check and there were no major EWRcs to increase that which is the thing that is a little strange. Small core system going over rough terrain gets beat up temporarily.
0 likes   

ljmac75
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2023 12:30 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2754 Postby ljmac75 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:10 pm

Nimbus wrote:
Teban54 wrote:
Teban54 wrote:I didn't see the high altitude of the plane earlier when reporting FL winds. Sorry if that misled anyone.

This drop is from the weaker NW eyewall, which still seems to show relatively good mixing down to the surface (as well as high FL/surface ratios).

https://i.postimg.cc/XYXN4c3k/MELISSA-NOAA2-2513A-dropsonde-202510282207.png

Here's the NE eyewall. While definitely not a major anymore, it probably doesn't change anything I said above fundamentally.

https://i.postimg.cc/k5dHfqjc/MELISSA-NOAA2-2513A-dropsonde-202510282214.png


Gusts to 60 knots currently being reported for Montego bay so this sounds reasonable.
They can't work on restoring the power lines till the wind subsides.

Cuba may luck out if we can get a little dry air entrained before landfall.

Where are you getting these obs for Montego bay?
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5439
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2755 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:16 pm

ljmac75 wrote:
Nimbus wrote:
Teban54 wrote:Here's the NE eyewall. While definitely not a major anymore, it probably doesn't change anything I said above fundamentally.

https://i.postimg.cc/k5dHfqjc/MELISSA-NOAA2-2513A-dropsonde-202510282214.png


Gusts to 60 knots currently being reported for Montego bay so this sounds reasonable.
They can't work on restoring the power lines till the wind subsides.

Cuba may luck out if we can get a little dry air entrained before landfall.

Where are you getting these obs for Montego bay?


Weather Underground link updates every few minutes I've seen wind speeds as high as 75 knots in squalls.

https://www.wunderground.com/weather/jm/montego-bay
0 likes   

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2756 Postby dukeblue219 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:16 pm

AF recon looks to be back airborne
0 likes   

zzzh
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1025
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:13 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2757 Postby zzzh » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:19 pm

There was definitely some sort of ERC going on with Melissa while inside Jamaica.
0 likes   

ljmac75
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2023 12:30 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2758 Postby ljmac75 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:20 pm

Nimbus wrote:
ljmac75 wrote:
Nimbus wrote:
Gusts to 60 knots currently being reported for Montego bay so this sounds reasonable.
They can't work on restoring the power lines till the wind subsides.

Cuba may luck out if we can get a little dry air entrained before landfall.

Where are you getting these obs for Montego bay?


Weather Underground link updates every few minutes I've seen wind speeds as high as 75 knots in squalls.

https://www.wunderground.com/weather/jm/montego-bay

Looks like it's just model output, nearest station hasn't reported since very early this morning.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6839
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2759 Postby LarryWx » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:23 pm

MarioProtVI wrote:Good news for Cuba but man the core got destroyed. We’re gonna be getting Erin post-ERC ratios now aren’t we. Also cuts down on the remaining ACE forecasted so it doesn’t seem like Melissa will beat Erin in terms of ACE as I don’t think it’ll regain major, and in fact the mountains of Cuba probably screw with it to the point it comes out the other side a sloppy Cat 1 or low-end 2, not the major NHC currently has tracking through there.


With Melissa headed to ~27.25 as of 0Z this evening, it will then be only 5 lower than Erin. I see very little chance (5%) that it won’t get an additional >5 ACE the next 96 hours before extratropical transition. Thus I feel quite confident that Melissa’s ACE will exceed Erin’s 32.2.

We’re now at 123.81 season to date with low 130s+ highly likely through Melissa.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5439
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2760 Postby Nimbus » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:30 pm

ljmac75 wrote:
Nimbus wrote:
ljmac75 wrote:Where are you getting these obs for Montego bay?


Weather Underground link updates every few minutes I've seen wind speeds as high as 75 knots in squalls.

https://www.wunderground.com/weather/jm/montego-bay

Looks like it's just model output, nearest station hasn't reported since very early this morning.


So you think the gusts being updated and changing every 5 minutes is just for show?
The airport closed this morning and there are internet connection outages all over the island but Weather Underground is usually connected to something.

The airport normally needs to have up to the minute wind speed information for take offs and landings. 5 or 10 mph wrong and you can cause an excursion.
0 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cdenton12 and 97 guests