GalvestonDuck wrote:Brett,
Mind if I ask you to clarify what you mean by faith being superficial?
I understand religion might be considered superficial to some, if you view it as merely the outward signs and practices of one's beliefs (i.e., a Catholic going to confession, a Methodist going to kneel in prayer during an alter call, or a Pentecostal speaking in tongues). Not saying those ARE superficial, but some could see it that way because there are those who ONLY do those things, but they lack faith on the inside.
To many, faith is not something that can be observed in someone simply because they obey a rule or receive a sacrament. Faith is a strong belief in something positive (for Christians -- that would be God's love, mercy, and divine grace) It's what motivates and inspires us. It's what guides us and gives us strength. It's actually very hard to put into words how awesome faith can be unless someone else also understands it. Certain pieces in your life just fall into place and for those of us who put our faith in God's hands, we know that God answered our prayers (even if the answer was "no" to what we asked for, but things still worked out in the end). And when that happens, our faith is strengthens more.
So, if by "superficial area of faith," you actually mean religion, I think I get your drift. There are those who talk the talk, but they don't walk the walk.
Another wonderful post IMO. Very good description of faith from an intelligent source that is willing to look at things from all angles. For all the debates I read through with the same tired regurgiated popular conservative rants and one-line responses that are about as thought-provoking as paint drying, this was a real breath of fresh air.
What I meant by the superficiality of faith is partially what you were describing... going through all the rituals, customs, traditions, etc., as if that is the most important aspect of a given religion... when CLEARLY, in my opinion, the far more important aspects are the guidelines on how to live life (compassion, nonviolence, etc.). The superficial portions may historically have played a great role in the religion, but to condemn someone who generally follows your (not you personally) religion's guidelines but does not go through the usual motions is just illogical and completely missing the point of having religion.
But again, I think you make some excellent, excellent points in your post about your faith. If this largely Christian board were to elect one member to debate religion with the non-believers, it would be foolish for it not to be you!