Gray downgrades numbers a tad

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Gray downgrades numbers a tad

#1 Postby hurricanetrack » Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:20 pm

Dr. Gray took the overall numbers down to 13 7 3

While-

Tropical storm risk RAISED their numbers to roughly 14 8 3

Bottom line: knarly hurricane season looks likely even with a weak El Nino possible.

http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/aug2004/
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#2 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:51 am

Every year the same thing, because the season has not being active, he may have said, let just lower a little bit the forecast. Also, every year he may say, "Well, I was out just by 3 or 4 tropical systems, which makes my forecast right".

:)
0 likes   

stormcloud
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: Houston

Dr. Gray's numbers

#3 Postby stormcloud » Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:05 am

Acknowledging an 'explosion' of storms is possible, lowering the the number of storms makes sense. We are beginning to run out of time to get the original number forecasted by Dr. Gray.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: Gray lowes numbers a tad

#4 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 06, 2004 4:37 am

hurricanetrack wrote:Dr. Gray took the overall numbers down to 13 7 3

While-

Tropical storm risk RAISED their numbers to roughly 14 8 3

Bottom line: knarly hurricane season looks likely even with a weak El Nino possible.

http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/aug2004/


:sleeping:
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4305
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

#5 Postby abajan » Fri Aug 06, 2004 5:32 am

His teams present prediction is exactly what they stated on December 5, 2003. Maybe they should have just made that one prediction and take a vacation!

LOL
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#6 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 06, 2004 5:36 am

abajan wrote:His teams present prediction is exactly what they stated on December 5, 2003. Maybe they should have just made that one prediction and take a vacation!

LOL


Exactly, spend the money on something more productive like intensity forecasting. Now that could make a difference.
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#7 Postby Trader Ron » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:03 am

Exactly what i predicted for Dr Gray's update.
I'm taking my numbers down to 11/5/2 from 12/6/2. I think i'm still high. We'll see.:)
0 likes   

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

#8 Postby Derecho » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:13 am

Always mystified why Gray, of all people, making quite clear, easily verified predictions on a regular schedule, who has been a real pioneer in the science, and who fairly clearly demonstrates actual skill in what he foreceasts, seems to generate such hostility and contempt.
0 likes   

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

Re: Dr. Gray's numbers

#9 Postby Derecho » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:14 am

stormcloud wrote:Acknowledging an 'explosion' of storms is possible, lowering the the number of storms makes sense. We are beginning to run out of time to get the original number forecasted by Dr. Gray.


Could have nothing form for two weeks and easily make those numbers.
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#10 Postby Trader Ron » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:17 am

One more thing. I'm surprised Dr Gray didn't take his numbers down more. If Shear persists, it will be a very quiet Hurricane season.
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#11 Postby Trader Ron » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:22 am

I thought we were going to be "Inundated" by storms. I'm still waiting.lol..:)

Dr Dray and The NHC work together. Dr Gray is "Brilliant" J.M.O. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

#12 Postby Hyperstorm » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:32 am

I still don't understand the amount of weight people put into what someone else says? It's like you don't have your own opinion and/or view of things. Everyone knew since the beginning of the season that the majority of the factors will be favorable for development and just because Dr. Gray lowers his numbers by "1", the season will end up being inactive? I just knew this was going to happen.

Of course, here we're talking about a quite respected forecaster who has been doing this for years, but does that mean he's ALWAYS right? Honestly this forecast doesn't make me lose my sleep. Why? This is the same strategy Dr. Gray uses ALMOST EVERY single year. Since 1995, you can barely count the number of times he has kept his initial forecast the same and/or raise the numbers in the August update. This is done only to be proven otherwise when the season ends.

Here's what I mean, since 1995 almost every season gets the numbers lowered in the August update and we end up having more activity than what he had even predicted at the beginning of the forecast. In VERY rare times, is his final forecast over what we have for the year. Just wait and you'll see.

Just as Derecho said, there's still plenty of time left in the season hence we can easily reach the original numbers he predicted, even if we stay in a quiet period for a few weeks.
Last edited by Hyperstorm on Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:47 am, edited 4 times in total.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38263
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#13 Postby Brent » Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:36 am

PEOPLE! It is Early August! The peak of hurricane season is not for 5 weeks. :roll:
0 likes   
#neversummer

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#14 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:26 am

Derecho wrote:Always mystified why Gray, of all people, making quite clear, easily verified predictions on a regular schedule, who has been a real pioneer in the science, and who fairly clearly demonstrates actual skill in what he foreceasts, seems to generate such hostility and contempt.


I think some people view at as a so what if he predicts 5,10 or 15. Does it really matter? What do people actually do with the info except for write articles about it? Maybe someone can justify why the number really matters. Now if he could pinpoint exact locations than we would be on to something but that would be an awfully big expectation to fill.
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

#15 Postby Agua » Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:30 am

His numbers could have immense value for actuaries, if they become accepted as having reliability. Does anyone know if any underwriters presently use his (or anyone else's) numbers?
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#16 Postby Lindaloo » Fri Aug 06, 2004 8:39 am

IMO, he should stick to his first numbers of the season. If he busts, he busts.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#17 Postby jlauderdal » Fri Aug 06, 2004 9:16 am

Agua wrote:His numbers could have immense value for actuaries, if they become accepted as having reliability. Does anyone know if any underwriters presently use his (or anyone else's) numbers?


My rates for hurricane insurance are set long before he releases his forecast. So we are still searching for a good reason for these predictions?
0 likes   

Guest

#18 Postby Guest » Fri Aug 06, 2004 9:26 am

so if some forecasts snow for YOU 48 hrs in advanced... but then warm comes in and it turns to ice or rain.... that forecast should NOT be updated?

ohhhhkay....

Lindaloo wrote:IMO, he should stick to his first numbers of the season. If he busts, he busts.
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

#19 Postby Agua » Fri Aug 06, 2004 9:30 am

jlauderdal wrote:
Agua wrote:His numbers could have immense value for actuaries, if they become accepted as having reliability. Does anyone know if any underwriters presently use his (or anyone else's) numbers?


My rates for hurricane insurance are set long before he releases his forecast. So we are still searching for a good reason for these predictions?


It wouldn't have to do with setting your current rates as much as determining how much the carriers should set aside as reserve in anticipated losses for a given risk, which, ultimately helps determine what the insurer can pocket as profit.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#20 Postby Lindaloo » Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:28 pm

DT wrote:so if some forecasts snow for YOU 48 hrs in advanced... but then warm comes in and it turns to ice or rain.... that forecast should NOT be updated?

ohhhhkay....

Lindaloo wrote:IMO, he should stick to his first numbers of the season. If he busts, he busts.


This is totally different! If you are going to put yourself out there with numbers then you should stick to them. You should be able to understand the busts though right DT?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests