Gray downgrades numbers a tad
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- hurricanetrack
- HurricaneTrack.com

- Posts: 1781
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
- Contact:
Gray downgrades numbers a tad
Dr. Gray took the overall numbers down to 13 7 3
While-
Tropical storm risk RAISED their numbers to roughly 14 8 3
Bottom line: knarly hurricane season looks likely even with a weak El Nino possible.
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/aug2004/
While-
Tropical storm risk RAISED their numbers to roughly 14 8 3
Bottom line: knarly hurricane season looks likely even with a weak El Nino possible.
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/aug2004/
0 likes
-
stormcloud
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 2:44 pm
- Location: Houston
Dr. Gray's numbers
Acknowledging an 'explosion' of storms is possible, lowering the the number of storms makes sense. We are beginning to run out of time to get the original number forecasted by Dr. Gray.
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: Gray lowes numbers a tad
hurricanetrack wrote:Dr. Gray took the overall numbers down to 13 7 3
While-
Tropical storm risk RAISED their numbers to roughly 14 8 3
Bottom line: knarly hurricane season looks likely even with a weak El Nino possible.
http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/fo ... 4/aug2004/

0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
- Trader Ron
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
- Location: Naples,Fl
- Contact:
Re: Dr. Gray's numbers
stormcloud wrote:Acknowledging an 'explosion' of storms is possible, lowering the the number of storms makes sense. We are beginning to run out of time to get the original number forecasted by Dr. Gray.
Could have nothing form for two weeks and easily make those numbers.
0 likes
- Trader Ron
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
- Location: Naples,Fl
- Contact:
- Trader Ron
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
- Location: Naples,Fl
- Contact:
- Hyperstorm
- Category 5

- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
- Location: Ocala, FL
I still don't understand the amount of weight people put into what someone else says? It's like you don't have your own opinion and/or view of things. Everyone knew since the beginning of the season that the majority of the factors will be favorable for development and just because Dr. Gray lowers his numbers by "1", the season will end up being inactive? I just knew this was going to happen.
Of course, here we're talking about a quite respected forecaster who has been doing this for years, but does that mean he's ALWAYS right? Honestly this forecast doesn't make me lose my sleep. Why? This is the same strategy Dr. Gray uses ALMOST EVERY single year. Since 1995, you can barely count the number of times he has kept his initial forecast the same and/or raise the numbers in the August update. This is done only to be proven otherwise when the season ends.
Here's what I mean, since 1995 almost every season gets the numbers lowered in the August update and we end up having more activity than what he had even predicted at the beginning of the forecast. In VERY rare times, is his final forecast over what we have for the year. Just wait and you'll see.
Just as Derecho said, there's still plenty of time left in the season hence we can easily reach the original numbers he predicted, even if we stay in a quiet period for a few weeks.
Of course, here we're talking about a quite respected forecaster who has been doing this for years, but does that mean he's ALWAYS right? Honestly this forecast doesn't make me lose my sleep. Why? This is the same strategy Dr. Gray uses ALMOST EVERY single year. Since 1995, you can barely count the number of times he has kept his initial forecast the same and/or raise the numbers in the August update. This is done only to be proven otherwise when the season ends.
Here's what I mean, since 1995 almost every season gets the numbers lowered in the August update and we end up having more activity than what he had even predicted at the beginning of the forecast. In VERY rare times, is his final forecast over what we have for the year. Just wait and you'll see.
Just as Derecho said, there's still plenty of time left in the season hence we can easily reach the original numbers he predicted, even if we stay in a quiet period for a few weeks.
Last edited by Hyperstorm on Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:47 am, edited 4 times in total.
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Derecho wrote:Always mystified why Gray, of all people, making quite clear, easily verified predictions on a regular schedule, who has been a real pioneer in the science, and who fairly clearly demonstrates actual skill in what he foreceasts, seems to generate such hostility and contempt.
I think some people view at as a so what if he predicts 5,10 or 15. Does it really matter? What do people actually do with the info except for write articles about it? Maybe someone can justify why the number really matters. Now if he could pinpoint exact locations than we would be on to something but that would be an awfully big expectation to fill.
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Agua wrote:His numbers could have immense value for actuaries, if they become accepted as having reliability. Does anyone know if any underwriters presently use his (or anyone else's) numbers?
My rates for hurricane insurance are set long before he releases his forecast. So we are still searching for a good reason for these predictions?
0 likes
-
Guest
jlauderdal wrote:Agua wrote:His numbers could have immense value for actuaries, if they become accepted as having reliability. Does anyone know if any underwriters presently use his (or anyone else's) numbers?
My rates for hurricane insurance are set long before he releases his forecast. So we are still searching for a good reason for these predictions?
It wouldn't have to do with setting your current rates as much as determining how much the carriers should set aside as reserve in anticipated losses for a given risk, which, ultimately helps determine what the insurer can pocket as profit.
0 likes
DT wrote:so if some forecasts snow for YOU 48 hrs in advanced... but then warm comes in and it turns to ice or rain.... that forecast should NOT be updated?
ohhhhkay....Lindaloo wrote:IMO, he should stick to his first numbers of the season. If he busts, he busts.
This is totally different! If you are going to put yourself out there with numbers then you should stick to them. You should be able to understand the busts though right DT?
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests




