Nogaps best model for Jeanne

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Nogaps best model for Jeanne

#1 Postby Vortex » Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:35 pm

Without question the 18z GFDL is a bad run. Looking synoptically the Nogaps without question has the best handle on Jeanne currently and forecasted. The WV imagery clearly depicts a very strong ridge to the north. If anything we may see wobbles wsw this evening. Synoptically the set-up until landfall is very straight-forward. So, while the GFDL run would be great news the fact is it's not going to happen. I expect the 00z run will likely correct itself. I think it's more and more likely that initial landfall will be between Fort Lauderdale and Jupiter. The faster the movement the more likely landfall is near Fort lauderdale.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10252
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

#2 Postby Blown Away » Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:38 pm

The NHC has said all along the speed would increase.
Don't you think they would have factored that in on
the models. I just assumed they did based on the
"NHC discussion" info.
0 likes   

caneman

Re: Nogaps best model for Jeanne

#3 Postby caneman » Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 pm

Vortex wrote:Without question the 18z GFDL is a bad run. Looking synoptically the Nogaps without question has the best handle on Jeanne currently and forecasted. The WV imagery clearly depicts a very strong ridge to the north. If anything we may see wobbles wsw this evening. Synoptically the set-up until landfall is very straight-forward. So, while the GFDL run would be great news the fact is it's not going to happen. I expect the 00z run will likely correct itself. I think it's more and more likely that initial landfall will be between Fort Lauderdale and Jupiter. The faster the movement the more likely landfall is near Fort lauderdale.


I agree and for the sake of us Floridians that NHC doesn't ride the GFDL in spite of all evidence to the contrary.
0 likes   

User avatar
tronbunny
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Central FL

#4 Postby tronbunny » Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:42 pm

Blown_away wrote:The NHC has said all along the speed would increase.
Don't you think they would have factored that in on
the models. I just assumed they did based on the
"NHC discussion" info.

The models are mostly independent of the NHC analysis.
Some one plugs in the synoptics at the moment (to the model grids), not the predicted conditions.
0 likes   

djti

#5 Postby djti » Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:48 pm

nogaps is way far west.......probably a go between with the gfdl and ukmet is the best bet.....if the nogaps is best are you saying the nhc are just blind idiots?
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#6 Postby MWatkins » Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:49 pm

djti wrote:nogaps is way far west.......probably a go between with the gfdl and ukmet is the best bet.....if the nogaps is best are you saying the nhc are just blind idiots?


I don't think he is. Remember the NHC average error at 48 hours is well within the spread between the NOGAPS model and the official forecast track.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Team Ghost and 233 guests