Nogaps best model for Jeanne
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Nogaps best model for Jeanne
Without question the 18z GFDL is a bad run. Looking synoptically the Nogaps without question has the best handle on Jeanne currently and forecasted. The WV imagery clearly depicts a very strong ridge to the north. If anything we may see wobbles wsw this evening. Synoptically the set-up until landfall is very straight-forward. So, while the GFDL run would be great news the fact is it's not going to happen. I expect the 00z run will likely correct itself. I think it's more and more likely that initial landfall will be between Fort Lauderdale and Jupiter. The faster the movement the more likely landfall is near Fort lauderdale.
0 likes
- Blown Away
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 10252
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am
-
caneman
Re: Nogaps best model for Jeanne
Vortex wrote:Without question the 18z GFDL is a bad run. Looking synoptically the Nogaps without question has the best handle on Jeanne currently and forecasted. The WV imagery clearly depicts a very strong ridge to the north. If anything we may see wobbles wsw this evening. Synoptically the set-up until landfall is very straight-forward. So, while the GFDL run would be great news the fact is it's not going to happen. I expect the 00z run will likely correct itself. I think it's more and more likely that initial landfall will be between Fort Lauderdale and Jupiter. The faster the movement the more likely landfall is near Fort lauderdale.
I agree and for the sake of us Floridians that NHC doesn't ride the GFDL in spite of all evidence to the contrary.
0 likes
Blown_away wrote:The NHC has said all along the speed would increase.
Don't you think they would have factored that in on
the models. I just assumed they did based on the
"NHC discussion" info.
The models are mostly independent of the NHC analysis.
Some one plugs in the synoptics at the moment (to the model grids), not the predicted conditions.
0 likes
-
djti
djti wrote:nogaps is way far west.......probably a go between with the gfdl and ukmet is the best bet.....if the nogaps is best are you saying the nhc are just blind idiots?
I don't think he is. Remember the NHC average error at 48 hours is well within the spread between the NOGAPS model and the official forecast track.
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: KirbyDude25, pepecool20, Torgo and 162 guests
