Latest Recon Analysis...More Bad News
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Latest Recon Analysis...More Bad News
First of all...the flight crew is reporting a 6 to 7 degree C temp difference between the eye and the environment...a clear sign of strengthening.
URNT12 KNHC 250420
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 25/0420Z
B. 26 DEG 26 MIN N
75 DEG 15 MIN W
C. 700 MB 2742 M
D. NA
E. NA
F. 045 DEG 100 KT
G. 315 DEG 23 NM
H. 962 MB
I. 10 C/ 3075 M
J. 16 C/ 3078 M
K. 10 C/ NA
L. CLOSED WALL
M. C40
N. 12345/7
O. 0.1/1 NM
P. AF968 1911A JEANNE OB 13
MAX FL WIND 110 KT SW QUAD 0233Z. SMALL GAP IN EYEWALL TO SE.
MAX FL TEMP 17 C AT 317 DEG / 013 NM.
Also...the movement has been yet again due west with no disernable N movement.
12:20 AM 26.4N 75.3W
10:39 PM 26.4N 74.9W
A forward speed around 12 knots. Still.
Pressure is down 3 MB from the previous fix too.
MW
URNT12 KNHC 250420
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 25/0420Z
B. 26 DEG 26 MIN N
75 DEG 15 MIN W
C. 700 MB 2742 M
D. NA
E. NA
F. 045 DEG 100 KT
G. 315 DEG 23 NM
H. 962 MB
I. 10 C/ 3075 M
J. 16 C/ 3078 M
K. 10 C/ NA
L. CLOSED WALL
M. C40
N. 12345/7
O. 0.1/1 NM
P. AF968 1911A JEANNE OB 13
MAX FL WIND 110 KT SW QUAD 0233Z. SMALL GAP IN EYEWALL TO SE.
MAX FL TEMP 17 C AT 317 DEG / 013 NM.
Also...the movement has been yet again due west with no disernable N movement.
12:20 AM 26.4N 75.3W
10:39 PM 26.4N 74.9W
A forward speed around 12 knots. Still.
Pressure is down 3 MB from the previous fix too.
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
-
PurdueWx80
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
yoda wrote:Yes... but two things:
Eyewall is open a bit to the SE
and they took the winds at 700 MB.... (is there a difference from the other one which was at 850?)
They used the old wind report from the 850 mb track, so there are no changes there. Pressure drop would indicate strengthening though.
0 likes
- yoda
- Category 5

- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
- Contact:
Shear is almost non-existent from CSMISS....
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8sht.html
except for that 20kt shear to its SW.. but that is over Cuba mostly...
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8sht.html
except for that 20kt shear to its SW.. but that is over Cuba mostly...
0 likes
- NJSnowFreak
- Tropical Low

- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:32 pm
I don't think they took a new wind measurement...
don't think the slight eyewall opening means much...
I'm just worried that it might hit south florida, an area with a LARGE Jewish population...a population that unfortunately won't be paying much attention to this hurricane during their holiday...
don't think the slight eyewall opening means much...
I'm just worried that it might hit south florida, an area with a LARGE Jewish population...a population that unfortunately won't be paying much attention to this hurricane during their holiday...
0 likes
-
KeyLargoDave
- Category 1

- Posts: 423
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:03 pm
- Location: 25 05' 80 26'
- Contact:
-
PurdueWx80
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
KeyLargoDave wrote:MW, thanks for posting the vortex data.
If that's 110k flight-level, 100k surface, = 115 mph -- isn't that much higher than 11 p.m. advisory?
As Derek pointed out to me earlier, 110 kt flight levels winds at 850 mb get an 80% reduction, so it is very close to what they have in the 11 p.m. advisory.
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
yoda wrote:Shear is almost non-existent from CSMISS....
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8sht.html
except for that 20kt shear to its SW.. but that is over Cuba mostly...
wait...arent you the same yoda that said that shear would hold the system down and also the ssts werent warm enough to allow strenghning. that was about 6 am friday after floydbuster posted his forecast. i can dig out the post if need be.
0 likes
-
SouthernWx
You beat me to the punch Mike...I just saw this..
It is significant that the recon crew went in this time at 700 mb (10,000'). My guess is they had a very rough ride on the first pass at 850 (5000'), and decided on a less risky approach.
The eye temp at 700 mb has increased from 15° to 17°c since 5 p.m....the spread between eye temp and eyewall temp has increased from 5° to 7° -- both signs the hurricane is strengthening (along with the pressure falling from 964 to 962 mb in less than 2 hrs).
Flight level winds in the NW eyewall were 115 mph (100 kt) the last pass....which tells me sustained surface winds are likely at least 105 mph...and probably more (higher winds are likely in the NE eyewall...and possibly in the SW eyewall as well, based on past recon supplementary vortex reports).
Jeanne is getting close to major hurricane status...
It is significant that the recon crew went in this time at 700 mb (10,000'). My guess is they had a very rough ride on the first pass at 850 (5000'), and decided on a less risky approach.
The eye temp at 700 mb has increased from 15° to 17°c since 5 p.m....the spread between eye temp and eyewall temp has increased from 5° to 7° -- both signs the hurricane is strengthening (along with the pressure falling from 964 to 962 mb in less than 2 hrs).
Flight level winds in the NW eyewall were 115 mph (100 kt) the last pass....which tells me sustained surface winds are likely at least 105 mph...and probably more (higher winds are likely in the NE eyewall...and possibly in the SW eyewall as well, based on past recon supplementary vortex reports).
Jeanne is getting close to major hurricane status...
0 likes
-
PurdueWx80
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
THead wrote:Isn't it kind of strange to have the highest winds in the SW quadrant?
Not at all if that's where the most intense convection is located. This is sort of a myth that has held on for some reason. During strengthening phases, winds can be maxed in any quadrant, particuarly where the most vigorous convection lies.
0 likes
- cape_escape
- Category 2

- Posts: 745
- Age: 56
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:39 am
- Location: Cape Coral Florida
- Contact:
- yoda
- Category 5

- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
- Contact:
jlauderdal wrote:yoda wrote:Shear is almost non-existent from CSMISS....
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8sht.html
except for that 20kt shear to its SW.. but that is over Cuba mostly...
wait...arent you the same yoda that said that shear would hold the system down and also the ssts werent warm enough to allow strenghning. that was about 6 am friday after floydbuster posted his forecast. i can dig out the post if need be.
Nope.. different Yoda that was...
Yes that was me...
Well the SSTs are still only about 84-85 degrees... but changed the shear forecast has... we will see. Wrong the Jedi Master can be once in a while, can't he?
0 likes
- yoda
- Category 5

- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
- Contact:
SouthernWx wrote:You beat me to the punch Mike...I just saw this..
It is significant that the recon crew went in this time at 700 mb (10,000'). My guess is they had a very rough ride on the first pass at 850 (5000'), and decided on a less risky approach.
The eye temp at 700 mb has increased from 15° to 17°c since 5 p.m....the spread between eye temp and eyewall temp has increased from 5° to 7° -- both signs the hurricane is strengthening (along with the pressure falling from 964 to 962 mb in less than 2 hrs).
Flight level winds in the NW eyewall were 115 mph (100 kt) the last pass....which tells me sustained surface winds are likely at least 105 mph...and probably more (higher winds are likely in the NE eyewall...and possibly in the SW eyewall as well, based on past recon supplementary vortex reports).
Jeanne is getting close to major hurricane status...
From an earlier Vortex..
URNT12 KNHC 250239
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 25/0239Z
B. 26 DEG 24 MIN N
74 DEG 51 MIN W
C. 850 MB 1088 M
D. NA
E. NA
F. 324 DEG 110 KT
G. 230 DEG 19 NM
H. 964 MB
I. 18 C/ 1533 M
J. 20 C/ 1544 M
K. 20 C/ NA
L. CLOSED WALL
M. C45
N. 12345/8
O. 0.1/1 NM
P. AF968 1911A JEANNE OB 08
MAX FL WIND 110 KT SW QUAD 0233Z.
MDT TURBC IN EYEWALL.
0 likes
I think we can take the 700MB reference as correct.
Extrapolate a weak side SW reading of 110 knots with dropping pressure and I think 110mph or more is reasonable. Mind you this isn't a Frances. It's a more direct synoptic along the underside of a High. Ivan being a recent example. These drops have much more significance...
If another drop follows shift to higher intensity...
Extrapolate a weak side SW reading of 110 knots with dropping pressure and I think 110mph or more is reasonable. Mind you this isn't a Frances. It's a more direct synoptic along the underside of a High. Ivan being a recent example. These drops have much more significance...
If another drop follows shift to higher intensity...
0 likes
- cape_escape
- Category 2

- Posts: 745
- Age: 56
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:39 am
- Location: Cape Coral Florida
- Contact:
Sanibel wrote:I think we can take the 700MB reference as correct.
Extrapolate a weak side SW reading of 110 knots with dropping pressure and I think 110mph or more is reasonable. Mind you this isn't a Frances. It's a more direct synoptic along the underside of a High. Ivan being a recent example. These drops have much more significance...
If another drop follows shift to higher intensity...
Hi again Sanibel! What do you think on Jeannes current trek, we should see over this way?
0 likes
- yoda
- Category 5

- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
- Contact:
SST's show about 28 degrees Celsius in area...
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/cyclone/d ... 7casst.png
**PLEASE NOTE THIS IS FROM SEPT. 23**
If anyone has a new one... please post it.
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/cyclone/d ... 7casst.png
**PLEASE NOTE THIS IS FROM SEPT. 23**
If anyone has a new one... please post it.
0 likes
-
SouthernWx
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests
