I suspect that on BT, that Otto will likely be shown as a subtropical depression starting on the 27th roughly about 12 UTC when a tight LLCC was evident but anemic on convection and a subtropical storm on the 29th at 00z ...
on another note, what does Otto serve to do?
delay the much anticipated PR releases of Frances, and Ivan ...
SF
Based on post analysis of Otto ...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Stormsfury
- Category 5
- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
-
cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 148503
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Agree 100% on both accounts SF.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
Stormsfury
- Category 5
- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I could go back to later on the 26 of Novemeber for subtropical depression. Then a subtropical storm later on the 27th. Becoming tropical ealy the 29th.
26th - still very cold-core and had obvious frontal structures ... the occluded low was still drawing colder, drier air from the NW ... and around to the southern side ...
SF
0 likes
-
Wnghs2007
- Category 5
- Posts: 6836
- Age: 36
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
- Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
- Contact:
Stormsfury wrote:Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:I could go back to later on the 26 of Novemeber for subtropical depression. Then a subtropical storm later on the 27th. Becoming tropical ealy the 29th.
26th - still very cold-core and had obvious frontal structures ... the occluded low was still drawing colder, drier air from the NW ... and around to the southern side ...
SF
Hmmm. I do happen to agree with that statement. And you can go back to post on the site saying it still looked Non Tropical
0 likes
-
Hyperstorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
- Location: Ocala, FL
The report on TS Otto is out. You were very close for the subtropical transition. It even mentions the possibility that Otto could have been a subtropical storm even earlier than what they proposed, probably near 0000Z on the 29th. Who knows? Aside from that, there's a few interesting things to point out about the report:
1) The system became a subtropical storm on 1200 29 November or about 30 hours before it was operationally upgraded to a tropical storm.
2) Ironically, the peak intensity of 45kts (50mph) occured during the subtropical storm stage.
3) It became a tropical storm on 1200 30 November or about 6 hours before it was operationally classified as such.
4) The system was carried on as a tropical depression until 0600 3 December or about 18 hours after advisories were dropped operationally.
I suspected this was going to occur. The NHC is always behind when initiating advisories on transitioning cyclones. Their saving grace is that there is not a well-defined line to distinguish between them (extratropical/subtropical/tropical), so they try to play conservative. On the other hand, I don't like when they play the totally opposite way when a system is fairly close to land. It seems as if they upgrade TOO quickly. Can I name Grace? This is a big contrast and NEEDS to be addressed.
Also, this report throws out the idea of Otto being the first/only named storm to develop on the last day of the hurricane season.
1) The system became a subtropical storm on 1200 29 November or about 30 hours before it was operationally upgraded to a tropical storm.
2) Ironically, the peak intensity of 45kts (50mph) occured during the subtropical storm stage.
3) It became a tropical storm on 1200 30 November or about 6 hours before it was operationally classified as such.
4) The system was carried on as a tropical depression until 0600 3 December or about 18 hours after advisories were dropped operationally.
I suspected this was going to occur. The NHC is always behind when initiating advisories on transitioning cyclones. Their saving grace is that there is not a well-defined line to distinguish between them (extratropical/subtropical/tropical), so they try to play conservative. On the other hand, I don't like when they play the totally opposite way when a system is fairly close to land. It seems as if they upgrade TOO quickly. Can I name Grace? This is a big contrast and NEEDS to be addressed.
Also, this report throws out the idea of Otto being the first/only named storm to develop on the last day of the hurricane season.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 163 guests