#37 Postby Huckster » Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:51 am
This is just an observation, and maybe this is not the right thread for such comments, but here it is. I know there is probably a disproportionate number of people on this board from Florida, so it's understandable that there's a deep interest in what this season will bring as far as Florida is concerned. There is plenty of talk comparing what might happen this year to what did happen last year, analog years, and so on. That's also understandable, especially in light of last year's devastating hurricanes in Florida. Then there's also the matter of who is "due" to get hit, though it's not been a big deal in this particular thread, and I think that issue has been sufficiently addressed elsewhere. Here's my point though. Why is it that there is so seldom any extended discussion on lets say Texas, Louisiana, or Mexico storms? Hurricanes do hit there you know. I don't recall much if any discussion on the exact meteorological setup that would bring storms into the western Gulf, though I do know what sort of an environment must exist. I think there's just not as much interest in that topic, and I'm curious to know just why there's not any more interest in that topic, especially from the people living in those areas. I can't ever remember hearing or reading any comments during any year, especially in March, such as, "Yeah, Texas and Mexico, watch out this hurricane season" or "My guess is that Louisiana and Mississippi both get hurricanes this year, and major ones at that. They'll probably form just south of Jamaica." How can anyone possibly know that anyway? Whatever the case is, I doubt anyone in those areas will be caught off guard if a storm or two heads their way. If we actually are in a period like the 1940's to the 1960's, then there's reason to believe that activity in the western Gulf is likely to heat up at some point soon. I just wonder if in years to come we'll be hearing people trying to forecast storms into Texas in August while it's still March.
0 likes