CFL wrote:The GFDL must be good for something if it's used by forecasters. Does it have any particular strengths?
Yeah, it lets them know what's NOT going to happen
Seriously, though, that's a good question...
Moderator: S2k Moderators

StormChasr wrote:The GFDL must be good for something if it's used by forecasters. Does it have any particular strengths?
Comedic value? Kind of like the stand up comic of weather forecasting?

Great point, Mike. Every model has it's shining moments and it's not so shining moments. It's best to look all the models, see which models initialize well, which models paint a non-out-of-whack solution, and which models paint a similiar solution to other models. After that, you can get a better feel (although not a definate feel) of what model will pan out correctly.~Floydbuster wrote:I would not bash the GFDL. It correctly showed a Cat 4 landfall for Charley, and took Ivan to Cat 5 in the Caribbean.

Jekyhe32210 wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only
The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion
Where do you get your info from?
mobilebay wrote:Jekyhe32210 wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only
The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion
Where do you get your info from?
He is a PRO MET and knows this.
Jekyhe32210 wrote:mobilebay wrote:Jekyhe32210 wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only
The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion
Where do you get your info from?
He is a PRO MET and knows this.
I had a whole paragraph written here but thats ok--all I can say is: WHATEVER!!!
Derek Ortt wrote:that info comes directly from the equations governing the atmosphere.
QG intensification is caused primarily either by warm advection at the surface or vorticity advection
Kevin_Cho wrote:Oh...really? I thought all of the SE coast got affected by both Jeanne and Frances...sorry, guess I was wrong...wait are you sure? B/C Miami/Dade did get alot of rain out of Jeanne and Frances right? Western Collier/Naples Metro barely got anything noticeable out of either system...I thought.
Kevin Cho - East Naples, FL
Junior: Naples High School
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 603 guests