GFDL= Hurricane New Orleans

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 798
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

#21 Postby tallywx » Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:51 pm

CFL wrote:The GFDL must be good for something if it's used by forecasters. Does it have any particular strengths?


Yeah, it lets them know what's NOT going to happen :lol:

Seriously, though, that's a good question...
0 likes   

StormChasr

#22 Postby StormChasr » Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:59 pm

The GFDL must be good for something if it's used by forecasters. Does it have any particular strengths?


Comedic value? Kind of like the stand up comic of weather forecasting? :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

#23 Postby HurryKane » Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:06 pm

StormChasr wrote:
The GFDL must be good for something if it's used by forecasters. Does it have any particular strengths?


Comedic value? Kind of like the stand up comic of weather forecasting? :wink:


I always look at GFDL like one of those little toy cars that you pull backwards to build up tension in the spring-driven wheels, then let it go while it runs amok. It gets the general idea of "forward" correct but then goes a little bat-guano crazy trying to get there.

But that's just me.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#24 Postby Anonymous » Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:29 pm

I would not bash the GFDL. It correctly showed a Cat 4 landfall for Charley, and took Ivan to Cat 5 in the Caribbean.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#25 Postby senorpepr » Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:31 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:I would not bash the GFDL. It correctly showed a Cat 4 landfall for Charley, and took Ivan to Cat 5 in the Caribbean.
Great point, Mike. Every model has it's shining moments and it's not so shining moments. It's best to look all the models, see which models initialize well, which models paint a non-out-of-whack solution, and which models paint a similiar solution to other models. After that, you can get a better feel (although not a definate feel) of what model will pan out correctly.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

#26 Postby HurryKane » Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:33 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:I would not bash the GFDL. It correctly showed a Cat 4 landfall for Charley, and took Ivan to Cat 5 in the Caribbean.


Sigh. Well, can I still pick on A98E then?
0 likes   

User avatar
The Big Dog
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:30 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

#27 Postby The Big Dog » Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:45 pm

Has anybody noticed that it maintains the storm as a hurricane all the way into Missouri? St. Louis better head to the Home Depot now. Must be feeding off the Mississippi River. Eh, I dunno.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29133
Age: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#28 Postby vbhoutex » Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:57 pm

The Big Dog wrote:Has anybody noticed that it maintains the storm as a hurricane all the way into Missouri? St. Louis better head to the Home Depot now. Must be feeding off the Mississippi River. Eh, I dunno.


I was wondering if anyone else had seen that!!!!LOLOL!!!!!
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#29 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:24 pm

I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only

The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion
0 likes   

Anonymous

#30 Postby Anonymous » Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:27 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only

The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion


Where do you get your info from?
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#31 Postby mobilebay » Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:27 pm

Jekyhe32210 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only

The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion


Where do you get your info from?

He is a PRO MET and knows this. :D
0 likes   

Anonymous

#32 Postby Anonymous » Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:43 pm

mobilebay wrote:
Jekyhe32210 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only

The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion


Where do you get your info from?

He is a PRO MET and knows this. :D


I had a whole paragraph written here but thats ok--all I can say is: WHATEVER!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#33 Postby mobilebay » Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:44 pm

Jekyhe32210 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
Jekyhe32210 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:I wonder if thats an uncoupled GFDL run, based upon the atmosphere only

The only way I can currently see this becoming a cane is if the QG parameters set up perfectly, but that would also tend to result in a more NE motion


Where do you get your info from?

He is a PRO MET and knows this. :D


I had a whole paragraph written here but thats ok--all I can say is: WHATEVER!!!

LOL!!! :lol: :lol:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#34 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:44 pm

that info comes directly from the equations governing the atmosphere.

QG intensification is caused primarily either by warm advection at the surface or vorticity advection
0 likes   

Anonymous

#35 Postby Anonymous » Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:52 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:that info comes directly from the equations governing the atmosphere.

QG intensification is caused primarily either by warm advection at the surface or vorticity advection


But do tropical systems go by these equations?? they are unusual occurances kinda freaks of nature...they dont occur everyday! Aerographers mates in the navy leave the forecasting of tropical systems up to those who know best---the NHC and also have a conference call with them everytime there is one available. NOT implying that you dont know what your are talking about--not at all but why are you so harshly disagreeing with the NHC?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#36 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:02 am

I'm not disagreeing with them at all. I am saying any development would be slow.

TC's do go by those equations when they start interacting with troughs and are not entirely tropical. Only a purely barotropic equation does not go by the tendency and omega equations.

About disagreeing at times with NHC, a good scientist NEVER takes someone else's word as gospel. They always perform an analysis to determine whether the claim can be verified, or questioned
0 likes   

User avatar
LaPlaceFF
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1303
Age: 58
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 1:21 pm
Location: Gramercy, LA
Contact:

#37 Postby LaPlaceFF » Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:47 am

Josephine96 wrote:I saw some Wal Mart hiding in the claims area of my Wal Mart today.. Maybe I'll "borrow" it till November lol


???????????????????????????????
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#38 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:23 am

Miami-Dade was the least affected
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#39 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:50 am

New orleans is falling into the sea anyways. I read it a few days ago :roll:
0 likes   

Foladar

#40 Postby Foladar » Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:45 am

Kevin_Cho wrote:Oh...really? I thought all of the SE coast got affected by both Jeanne and Frances...sorry, guess I was wrong...wait are you sure? B/C Miami/Dade did get alot of rain out of Jeanne and Frances right? Western Collier/Naples Metro barely got anything noticeable out of either system...I thought.

Kevin Cho - East Naples, FL
Junior: Naples High School

South Miami Dade here and we got absolutely nothing.
People were actually outside BBQing during Frances .. we did get some rain but from Jeanne I remember pretty much nothing. Gas was aplenty. We were suppose to get tons from Frances so everyone was prepared, but it decided to run away last second. I would say Miami Dade did get the least, esp. south Miami Dade.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 581 guests