Canadian: New Orleans-Gulfport!!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 58
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

#21 Postby LSU2001 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:37 pm

gkrangers read Purdues post responding to erics due west thread.
TIm

Ps tell me what you think of his assessment.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

jax

#22 Postby jax » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:41 pm

Swimdude wrote:
BRCop wrote:Looks like a Gulfport/Biloxi hit to me. That would still push a lot of water into Lake Ponchatrain.



Same path as Camille... How did New Orleans fare in that one?


http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/at196903.asp

Camille actually came from the south...
New Orleans got the hard north wind...
if this track were to happen... BAD NEWS.
Dennis would WEDGE a huge wall of water
that wouldn't have an outlet... It's a huge
triangle between the mouth of the river
and the Mississippi coast. A Cat 3-4 storm
with typical 10-18 foot surge could be wedged
up to 20-30 with the right angle (as Camille did)
but with this angle... it would all push up into
Lake Bourne and Panchatrain... North wind
would push all that into the City... YIKES
Last edited by jax on Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#23 Postby rtd2 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:43 pm

gkrangers wrote:This run of the Canadian still sucks...it takes the storm due west for a while at initialization...which is crap.

The GFS also does some wierd things, taking the storm so far north across Cuba....



I agree canadian is bad on initial run but like I said earlier I think the HP will push Dennis Due West abit Just north of Cuba!
0 likes   

PurdueWx80
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2720
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

#24 Postby PurdueWx80 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:43 pm

I'll just skip over to this post in case the mods want to lock the other one.

00z GEM analysis - skip to the upper right chart, which is the surface analysis: Notice the lat-lon lines, which denote east-west and north-south, respectively.

Image
The storm is slightly south of the 20N line - unfortunately, the image is too small for me to see how close it was to the actual 00z position.

Now, valid at 12z:

Image

The storm is up near 21.5 N or so, clearly a gain in latitude - it is also just south of the coastline of Cuba.
0 likes   

gkrangers

#25 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:44 pm

The low is still too far west on the surface charts. Takes Dennis south of Cuba then jumps over the western tip and heads north. Dennis is going to cross central Cuba and emerge into the gulf much further east than the Canadian suggests.

Its not horrible, but its not a good run either, in my not so educated opinion.

I jumped the gun by not looking closely enuf...the 500mb plots stood out after I saw that other guys post on it.
Last edited by gkrangers on Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Javlin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1621
Age: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: ms gulf coast

#26 Postby Javlin » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:46 pm

Thats it Dhweather fricken Sunday night to boot just a little freaky to much dejavue.
0 likes   

User avatar
AL Chili Pepper
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

#27 Postby AL Chili Pepper » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:47 pm

We'll know soon enough whether it's onto something or not.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#28 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:47 pm

Well I certainly doubt it this huge shift will verify, this run is much better than the FL coast hugger we saw earlier.

Mobile-Panama City is the target zone at this time.

P.S UKMET is in and keeps the same story as it has had all along...Interesting developments with all the models this evening...
0 likes   

User avatar
AL Chili Pepper
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

#29 Postby AL Chili Pepper » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:51 pm

Also, the UKMet and Canadian have Dennis crossing the western tip of Cuba, not the central part. That can be a benchmark of sorts.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

#30 Postby tailgater » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:53 pm


THAT"S the one we don't want to verify. That would be really bad news for your neighbors on the South shore
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#31 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:55 pm

tailgater wrote:

THAT"S the one we don't want to verify. That would be really bad news for your neighbors on the South shore

That's the MM5. Its experimental, NOT OPERATIONAL. Take it with a grain of salt. I have heard good things of it as a mesoscale model but not sure as a tropical one.
0 likes   

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

#32 Postby Derecho » Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:27 am

Nobody should particularly care what the Canadian has; it's just a bad model with bad tropical verification stats.

It flops around wildly.

Not much data, but it's been the worst Dennis model so far by a huge margin.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#33 Postby mobilebay » Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:30 am

Derecho wrote:Nobody should particularly care what the Canadian has; it's just a bad model with bad tropical verification stats.

It flops around wildly.

Not much data, but it's been the worst Dennis model so far by a huge margin.

Up until the 18Z run the NAM was hanging in there with it though. :lol: The CMC and NAm have both clustered within the NOLA-PCOLA areas though.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Team Ghost and 123 guests