Can someone tell me what this means?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
tampastorm
- Category 1

- Posts: 434
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:22 pm
- Location: TAMPA
Can someone tell me what this means?
this is from the 5:00 upate upper-air data indicate a cold pool of -10c has
developed over northern Lousiana along a 500 mb trough axis...which
none of the models intialized very well. The colder air aloft
should help create a slightly stronger mid- to upper-level low than
the global...GFDL...and NAM models are forecasting to drop south of
Lousiana over the nothwestern Gulf. The result should be a deep-
layer southeasterly steering flow remaining over the eastern Gulf
of Mexico throughout the forecast period.
developed over northern Lousiana along a 500 mb trough axis...which
none of the models intialized very well. The colder air aloft
should help create a slightly stronger mid- to upper-level low than
the global...GFDL...and NAM models are forecasting to drop south of
Lousiana over the nothwestern Gulf. The result should be a deep-
layer southeasterly steering flow remaining over the eastern Gulf
of Mexico throughout the forecast period.
0 likes
just another factor in the steering flow which led the nhc to forecast the following track:
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at200504.html
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at200504.html
0 likes
-
LilNoles2005
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:32 am
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
truth be told...nobody know where the track/path is going...there are 2 distinct possiblities....just like that discussion said....Ridge could be stronger and it goes WNW and then NW at landfall...or it could go NW from now to landfalll....you don't know, i don't know..the GFS certainly dosn't know. and the NHC dosn't really know...
0 likes
truth be told...nobody know where the track/path is going...there are 2 distinct possiblities....just like that discussion said....Ridge could be stronger and it goes WNW and then NW at landfall...or it could go NW from now to landfalll....you don't know, i don't know..the GFS certainly dosn't know. and the NHC dosn't really know...
completely disagree.....there arent really 2 distinct possibilities any more...there were 24-36 hours ago but the weakening ridge solution has verified......this close in the NHC can use actual data about what is really happening to verify the models and choose the forecast path vs just picking a consensus of the models like they have to do from days 4-7. its extremely unlikely that the eventual landfall will be more than 50 miles off at this point.
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
deltadog03 wrote:truth be told...nobody know where the track/path is going...there are 2 distinct possiblities....just like that discussion said....Ridge could be stronger and it goes WNW and then NW at landfall...or it could go NW from now to landfalll....you don't know, i don't know..the GFS certainly dosn't know. and the NHC dosn't really know...
Agree - hence the distance of the "watch" area along the coast.
0 likes
-
tampastorm
- Category 1

- Posts: 434
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:22 pm
- Location: TAMPA
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
Ixolib wrote:deltadog03 wrote:truth be told...nobody know where the track/path is going...there are 2 distinct possiblities....just like that discussion said....Ridge could be stronger and it goes WNW and then NW at landfall...or it could go NW from now to landfalll....you don't know, i don't know..the GFS certainly dosn't know. and the NHC dosn't really know...
Agree - hence the distance of the "watch" area along the coast.
VERY much so AGREED...we should all keep one basic thing in mind really...weather is not set in stone until it happens...period..including canes
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
- AL Chili Pepper
- Category 3

- Posts: 873
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
- Location: Mobile, AL
-
NorthGaWeather
djtil wrote:truth be told...nobody know where the track/path is going...there are 2 distinct possiblities....just like that discussion said....Ridge could be stronger and it goes WNW and then NW at landfall...or it could go NW from now to landfalll....you don't know, i don't know..the GFS certainly dosn't know. and the NHC dosn't really know...
completely disagree.....there arent really 2 distinct possibilities any more...there were 24-36 hours ago but the weakening ridge solution has verified......this close in the NHC can use actual data about what is really happening to verify the models and choose the forecast path vs just picking a consensus of the models like they have to do from days 4-7. its extremely unlikely that the eventual landfall will be more than 50 miles off at this point.
I wouldn't say extremely unlikely. Forecast errors can still occur.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 38 guests





