00:00z Model Guidance=Old Mexico
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 148502
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
hicksta please,please,please stop your -removed-,you are almost crossing that fine line or else
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
senorpepr wrote:hicksta wrote:senorpepr wrote:Right... this storm has been tracking south. That's evident from looking at the extrapolation of the storm (that dotted black line) that continues the current motion forward for five days. This has been south of the consensus for a while...
Corrrect. But right now she is north of her next projected point
Ummm... I don't see how you are getting that Emily is north of her next projected point. She's been tracking south of model and NHC guidance for a while now.
Look at the NHC sat loops and put the forecast points on...shes due east of the next one moving wnw...so odds are she will pass that point to the north a bit.
0 likes
-
cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 148502
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
hicksta wrote:Cyclone please check you pm's.
Enough said.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Normandy wrote:senorpepr wrote:hicksta wrote:senorpepr wrote:Right... this storm has been tracking south. That's evident from looking at the extrapolation of the storm (that dotted black line) that continues the current motion forward for five days. This has been south of the consensus for a while...
Corrrect. But right now she is north of her next projected point
Ummm... I don't see how you are getting that Emily is north of her next projected point. She's been tracking south of model and NHC guidance for a while now.
Look at the NHC sat loops and put the forecast points on...shes due east of the next one moving wnw...so odds are she will pass that point to the north a bit.
its not due east, yet...
0 likes
-
hicksta
- Category 5
- Posts: 1108
- Age: 35
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
- Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA
canegrl04 wrote:I will wait and see where the models are trending on Sunday .Then I will believe its a certain path
Exactly, Once she leaves the Yucatan we should have a great idea of where she would be going. Now the models are reading a strengthing in the ridge pushing her more west. They could change thought only time can tell
0 likes
-
wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
I'd point out that when a storm begins wrapping up, as Emily is doing once more, the eye will tend to wobble around quite a bit. So we need to watch for a long-term trend (12-24 hours) and not short-term movements. Interesting that all latest model guidance is now farther south. Even the GFS which had Emily moving into the mid TX coast is now putting Emily inland north of Tampico, MX.
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
-
hicksta
- Category 5
- Posts: 1108
- Age: 35
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
- Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA
Derek, I just looked at the GFS 00z. it had it north of brownsivlle but south of corpus.. while the 18z had it mexico.. why is there a big change between them and which one is the more accurate
http://wxforecaster.com/model12.htm GFS 500mb 00z... am i looking at the wrong one or is that site just not updated
http://wxforecaster.com/model12.htm GFS 500mb 00z... am i looking at the wrong one or is that site just not updated
0 likes
-
deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
hicksta wrote:Derek, I just looked at the GFS 00z. it had it north of brownsivlle but south of corpus.. while the 18z had it mexico.. why is there a big change between them and which one is the more accurate
http://wxforecaster.com/model12.htm GFS 500mb 00z... am i looking at the wrong one or is that site just not updated
the 00z should NOT be out yet...you can always tell cuz nam will run first...and it hasn't started yet..
0 likes
-
HURAKAN
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 46086
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
Re: 00:00z Model Guidance=Old Mexico
cycloneye wrote:Muchos Tacos.
Mucho caos diría yo.
Much chaos I would say.
0 likes