When will this season get REALLY active?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

#21 Postby boca » Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:16 pm

As long as we have ULL's all over the Atlantic the season will not be as active but that will most likely change in 2 or 3 weeks.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#22 Postby WindRunner » Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:25 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:(TB Hurricane peers into his explicit crystal ball)

So this temporary lull will probably last till about the 13-15th I'd say. Then we go back to a strong active pattern...time will tell oh well...
What about MJO and shear factors????


Favorable MJO is coming up shortly, and shear from the ULLs will last who knows how long, but the MJO seems to be the bigger factor. My date: 11th-13th.
0 likes   

User avatar
Astro_man92
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
Contact:

#23 Postby Astro_man92 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:34 pm

Umm i already made a poll on this here is the link

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=69708 I made it a while ago (about 3 or 4 days ago lol)Never mind
Last edited by Astro_man92 on Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Jack8631
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 702
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Location: Central Alabama

#24 Postby Jack8631 » Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:13 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Thanks for good info.

Smart-alecky post ignored.


When you post a ridiculous topic, expect a little constructive criticism.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#25 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:46 pm


As I pointed out earlier, there has been a bona fide lull since Emily. Due to the factors causing this lull and my general concern, there is nothing "ridiculous" about asking when the lull will end.

If I wanted to, I could call your failure to consider the lull "ridiculous", but I will not stoop to that level.

My initial intent was never to downplay what already happened, but to try to discern when certain factors would favor a return to intense activity that has been absent since Emily.
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:02 am, edited 11 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#26 Postby Hurricaneman » Sat Aug 06, 2005 11:58 pm

at the earliest aug 10
at the latest aug 20
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#27 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:02 am

Thank you all for the information.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#28 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:07 am

The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Update:
If the GFS has merit, the MJO and other factors should
become more favorable for development by
August 10-15, leading to several potential systems
by August 20-30th. :eek: Things may explode sometime
in late August.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#29 Postby Scorpion » Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:16 am

August 20th or so all hell breaks loose in the Atlantic.
0 likes   

kevin

#30 Postby kevin » Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:35 am

When was the lull????!

There are two tropical systems out there!
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#31 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:39 am

The lull is based on Unfavorable Madden Julian Oscillation.


I know but they were relatively weak compared to the serious major activity brought on my Emily and Dennis- This is clearly less active than the dennis/emily period.
I am referring to the MJO favorability phases, and have found my answer 8-)
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#32 Postby Frank2 » Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:29 pm

Yes, since Emily there has been a lull, relatively speaking, for various reasons - the F, G, H, and I systems have all been relatively weak (never having reached hurricane status), and no other depressions have formed within this same period.

If all hurricane seasons were like the past four systems, this board would be out of business (and so would the plywood distributors) - it's a good guess that most if not all down here are glad for the respite.

Frank
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#33 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:37 pm

there hasnt been that of a significant lull. Harvey is still out there and Irene just formed albeit she is gonna be a fish most likely.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#34 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:47 pm

I am glad also for the lull since now it is easier to do house repairs.
0 likes   

gkrangers

#35 Postby gkrangers » Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:48 pm

The lull may be better described as unfavorable conditions for significant tropical development in the Atlantic basin.
0 likes   

User avatar
Jack8631
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 702
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Location: Central Alabama

#36 Postby Jack8631 » Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:58 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:
As I pointed out earlier, there has been a bona fide lull since Emily. Due to the factors causing this lull and my general concern, there is nothing "ridiculous" about asking when the lull will end.

If I wanted to, I could call your failure to consider the lull "ridiculous", but I will not stoop to that level.

My initial intent was never to downplay what already happened, but to try to discern when certain factors would favor a return to intense activity that has been absent since Emily.


No need for the bold text; I understand where you are coming from. The fact remains that we are experiencing a tropical season that has already made history..breaking records that have been kept since 1851. I still don't agree that there is a "lull"; last time I checked we had two active tropical storms.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#37 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:04 pm

Jack8631 wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:
As I pointed out earlier, there has been a bona fide lull since Emily. Due to the factors causing this lull and my general concern, there is nothing "ridiculous" about asking when the lull will end.

If I wanted to, I could call your failure to consider the lull "ridiculous", but I will not stoop to that level.

My initial intent was never to downplay what already happened, but to try to discern when certain factors would favor a return to intense activity that has been absent since Emily.


No need for the bold text; I understand where you are coming from. The fact remains that we are experiencing a tropical season that has already made history..breaking records that have been kept since 1851. I still don't agree that there is a "lull"; last time I checked we had two active tropical storms.


I agree with you. Although neither Harvey nor Irene is currently causing problems to any landmass, they are still there. Perhaps this lull some people refer to is the fact that none is in immediate striking distance of any land. who knows.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#38 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:08 pm

I apologize for overreacting to your posts. :)

You are right, we are still making history with a ninth named storm for example.

We are not in a true lull I agree. But I was thinking of MJO, which I should have specified at the beginning of the post.


Thank you all for the replies :wink: 8-)


Yee hawww it's tropics time!!!
Vhahoo vheer iz zeee clickerrr...
0 likes   

User avatar
Jack8631
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 702
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Location: Central Alabama

#39 Postby Jack8631 » Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:20 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:I apologize for overreacting to your posts. :)

You are right, we are still making history with a ninth named storm for example.

We are not in a true lull I agree. But I was thinking of MJO, which I should have specified at the beginning of the post.


Thank you all for the replies :wink: 8-)


Yee hawww it's tropics time!!!
Vhahoo vheer iz zeee clickerrr...


I'd like to apologize as well for calling you out like that. Very much out of character for me.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#40 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:25 pm

IMHO this is a lull, but it's not because nothing hit land. There can be five fish out in the Atlantic that are major hurricanes and that's not a lull, but five in a month that hit land but are TS's, and that is a lull. Look at all the potential developers over the last few weeks, and only four developed, and all were TS's, none were hurricanes. The lull is caused somewhat by the SAL but moreso by the ULL's that crisscross the Atlantic (refer to NHC's Irene disco at 11:00 AM). Whether this has anything to do with the MJO I don't know, but there is an interesting correlation between the MJO and the reduced activity.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abajan, Ulf and 27 guests