When will this season get REALLY active?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:(TB Hurricane peers into his explicit crystal ball)
So this temporary lull will probably last till about the 13-15th I'd say. Then we go back to a strong active pattern...time will tell oh well...
What about MJO and shear factors????
Favorable MJO is coming up shortly, and shear from the ULLs will last who knows how long, but the MJO seems to be the bigger factor. My date: 11th-13th.
0 likes
- Astro_man92
- Category 5
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
- Contact:
Umm i already made a poll on this here is the link
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=69708 I made it a while ago (about 3 or 4 days ago lol)Never mind
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=69708 I made it a while ago (about 3 or 4 days ago lol)Never mind
Last edited by Astro_man92 on Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 5597
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
As I pointed out earlier, there has been a bona fide lull since Emily. Due to the factors causing this lull and my general concern, there is nothing "ridiculous" about asking when the lull will end.
If I wanted to, I could call your failure to consider the lull "ridiculous", but I will not stoop to that level.
My initial intent was never to downplay what already happened, but to try to discern when certain factors would favor a return to intense activity that has been absent since Emily.
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:02 am, edited 11 times in total.
0 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 5597
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 5597
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Update:
If the GFS has merit, the MJO and other factors should
become more favorable for development by
August 10-15, leading to several potential systems
by August 20-30th.
Things may explode sometime
in late August.
Update:
If the GFS has merit, the MJO and other factors should
become more favorable for development by
August 10-15, leading to several potential systems
by August 20-30th.

in late August.
0 likes
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 5597
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
The lull is based on Unfavorable Madden Julian Oscillation.
I know but they were relatively weak compared to the serious major activity brought on my Emily and Dennis- This is clearly less active than the dennis/emily period.
I am referring to the MJO favorability phases, and have found my answer
I know but they were relatively weak compared to the serious major activity brought on my Emily and Dennis- This is clearly less active than the dennis/emily period.
I am referring to the MJO favorability phases, and have found my answer

0 likes
Yes, since Emily there has been a lull, relatively speaking, for various reasons - the F, G, H, and I systems have all been relatively weak (never having reached hurricane status), and no other depressions have formed within this same period.
If all hurricane seasons were like the past four systems, this board would be out of business (and so would the plywood distributors) - it's a good guess that most if not all down here are glad for the respite.
Frank
If all hurricane seasons were like the past four systems, this board would be out of business (and so would the plywood distributors) - it's a good guess that most if not all down here are glad for the respite.
Frank
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4806
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
- Location: South Florida
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 5597
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
- Jack8631
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 702
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
- Location: Central Alabama
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:
As I pointed out earlier, there has been a bona fide lull since Emily. Due to the factors causing this lull and my general concern, there is nothing "ridiculous" about asking when the lull will end.
If I wanted to, I could call your failure to consider the lull "ridiculous", but I will not stoop to that level.
My initial intent was never to downplay what already happened, but to try to discern when certain factors would favor a return to intense activity that has been absent since Emily.
No need for the bold text; I understand where you are coming from. The fact remains that we are experiencing a tropical season that has already made history..breaking records that have been kept since 1851. I still don't agree that there is a "lull"; last time I checked we had two active tropical storms.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4806
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
- Location: South Florida
Jack8631 wrote:Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:
As I pointed out earlier, there has been a bona fide lull since Emily. Due to the factors causing this lull and my general concern, there is nothing "ridiculous" about asking when the lull will end.
If I wanted to, I could call your failure to consider the lull "ridiculous", but I will not stoop to that level.
My initial intent was never to downplay what already happened, but to try to discern when certain factors would favor a return to intense activity that has been absent since Emily.
No need for the bold text; I understand where you are coming from. The fact remains that we are experiencing a tropical season that has already made history..breaking records that have been kept since 1851. I still don't agree that there is a "lull"; last time I checked we had two active tropical storms.
I agree with you. Although neither Harvey nor Irene is currently causing problems to any landmass, they are still there. Perhaps this lull some people refer to is the fact that none is in immediate striking distance of any land. who knows.
<RICKY>
0 likes
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 5597
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
I apologize for overreacting to your posts.
You are right, we are still making history with a ninth named storm for example.
We are not in a true lull I agree. But I was thinking of MJO, which I should have specified at the beginning of the post.
Thank you all for the replies
Yee hawww it's tropics time!!!
Vhahoo vheer iz zeee clickerrr...

You are right, we are still making history with a ninth named storm for example.
We are not in a true lull I agree. But I was thinking of MJO, which I should have specified at the beginning of the post.
Thank you all for the replies


Yee hawww it's tropics time!!!
Vhahoo vheer iz zeee clickerrr...
0 likes
- Jack8631
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 702
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
- Location: Central Alabama
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:I apologize for overreacting to your posts.![]()
You are right, we are still making history with a ninth named storm for example.
We are not in a true lull I agree. But I was thinking of MJO, which I should have specified at the beginning of the post.
Thank you all for the replies![]()
Yee hawww it's tropics time!!!
Vhahoo vheer iz zeee clickerrr...
I'd like to apologize as well for calling you out like that. Very much out of character for me.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
IMHO this is a lull, but it's not because nothing hit land. There can be five fish out in the Atlantic that are major hurricanes and that's not a lull, but five in a month that hit land but are TS's, and that is a lull. Look at all the potential developers over the last few weeks, and only four developed, and all were TS's, none were hurricanes. The lull is caused somewhat by the SAL but moreso by the ULL's that crisscross the Atlantic (refer to NHC's Irene disco at 11:00 AM). Whether this has anything to do with the MJO I don't know, but there is an interesting correlation between the MJO and the reduced activity.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Brent, Google Adsense [Bot] and 40 guests