ATL: IRMA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
tolakram
- Admin
- Posts: 20010
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
BucMan2 wrote:is it me or does it look south on this run?
Both south and west.
0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
tolakram
- Admin
- Posts: 20010
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
GFS has to be dramatic with shifts.
1 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
stormreader
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
tolakram wrote:West
GFS beginning to catch up with the west trends. Its about time.
0 likes
-
tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
There is now good consensus among the top three models, the ECMWF, the UKMET, and the 
Took the GFS a long time to catch up, but it is finally there. Prayers to Florida from NC.
Took the GFS a long time to catch up, but it is finally there. Prayers to Florida from NC.
3 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
p1nheadlarry
- Category 2
- Posts: 672
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
- Location: SR County FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
stormreader wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:911mb at 48hrs.....not good!
Yeah, falling pressure. My hunch is that the storm might very well come in as a Cat 5. And a solid CAT 5 at that. Will leave it at that.
It's hard to gauge a return period for events like this because we only have a short record and question marks about other storms before the satellite era. More time has passed between Irma and Andrew than Camille and Andrew...food for thought in a warming globe...
1 likes
--;->#GoNoles--;->.
-
gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23691
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Turning north: 
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
tolakram
- Admin
- Posts: 20010
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
FLpanhandle91
- Category 5
- Posts: 1033
- Age: 34
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
- Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
MetroMike wrote:My local chief Met Paul Dellegato from Fox 13 Has been studying the the GFS verification and he has said it has not done well last couple days.
Which is why the NHC has pretty much ignored it for 3 or 4 days now. The signs were there, but too many have been showing "all the models" and assuming each outcome was equally likely.
4 likes
-
tolakram
- Admin
- Posts: 20010
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
Langinbang187
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Looks like the stubborn GFS has finally admitted defeat here. Brutal run for Miami.
0 likes
-
FLpanhandle91
- Category 5
- Posts: 1033
- Age: 34
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
- Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
GFS shows a definite slow down before the turn north this run. Doesn't look as quick and unrealistic.
0 likes
-
Jevo
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1729
- Age: 47
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: The Flemish Cap
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
+72 - 78 ... In line with the NHC... Perhaps they are adding more weight to the GFS than we are assuming...
0 likes
Disclaimer: 50% of the time I have no clue of what I am talking about. Chances are I am taking a less than educated guess that sounds good because 10 years ago I stole Mike Watkins book 'The Hurricane and its Impact'. For official information please direct yourself to the NHC and their cadre of weather geniuses.
-
Hurrilurker
- Category 2
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
FLpanhandle91 wrote:
Bad run for Miami.
You really couldn't draw up a more nightmarish scenario if you tried.
3 likes
-
stormreader
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
p1nheadlarry wrote:stormreader wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:911mb at 48hrs.....not good!
Yeah, falling pressure. My hunch is that the storm might very well come in as a Cat 5. And a solid CAT 5 at that. Will leave it at that.
It's hard to gauge a return period for events like this because we only have a short record and question marks about other storms before the satellite era. More time has passed between Irma and Andrew than Camille and Andrew...food for thought in a warming globe...
Another thing, this storm was major in the far distant Atlantic where sea surface temps, interactions with mid-oceanic ULL's usually don't allow for that. Its been CAT 5 for days now. Barring a landfall in Cuba, I don't think I see this reducing down to 4. No shear forecast, I don't think, till further north after landfall. Also, looking at latest loop, I think the eye looks a little more symmetrical now than it has for the last 24 hours or so. Eye structure hasn't looked perfect lately, but pressure remained at about 922mb. This one is one for the books.
2 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
It is remarkable how good the NHC is with their tracks. They release a track at 5 pm and the GFS essentially mimics it 30 minutes later.
4 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests