
Moderator: S2k Moderators




Stormgodess wrote:cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
Noob question:
Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?
I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.
But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.
Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.

Stormgodess wrote:cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
Noob question:
Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?
I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.
But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.
Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.



ATDoel wrote:I’m surprised no one has mentioned its forward speed(or lack of) as one of the factors why the wind speed is relatively low. A hurricanes stronger side is the side with a positive movement vector, the movement of the storm adds to the windspeed. If Melissa was moving 15 MPH, it would likely be a cat 5.
Travorum wrote:There's no mention of any sort of ERC in the 03z advisory, meld or otherwise, completed or not. As for the SW motion over the past few hours, the NHC thinks this won't have a significant impact on track in the long run:Although the eye wobbled a bit to the south recently, this is
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.
They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft has been
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt


cheezyWXguy wrote:Stormgodess wrote:cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.
Noob question:
Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?
I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.
But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.
Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.
I can’t speak for the mods, but I don’t think this is an unreasonable question that would require removal.
That said, I’m confident that if the equipment on these flights were miscalibrated, there would be distinct signs. Considering that there are often two planes simultaneously flying through this storm, each dropping dropsondes, you would see notable discrepancies between the plane readings and their respective dropsondes as they overlap each other’s territory. None of that has been seen in any flights in this storm’s existence though.


Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.


FLpanhandle91 wrote:This feels like an Eta recon pass all over again. Lol. Cold CDO isn't everything folks. Late season Dvorak can be misleading.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests