NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
WaveBreaking
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:33 am
Location: US

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1141 Postby WaveBreaking » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:01 pm

:double:

Image
6 likes   
I am NOT a professional meteorologist, so take all of my posts with a grain of salt. My opinions are mine and mine alone.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 623
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1142 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:01 pm

There's no mention of any sort of ERC in the 03z advisory, meld or otherwise, completed or not. As for the SW motion over the past few hours, the NHC thinks this won't have a significant impact on track in the long run:

Although the eye wobbled a bit to the south recently, this is
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.


They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.

A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft has been
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1958
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1143 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:03 pm

Hot take: another phase of ERI may have just started.
:froze: :onfire:
 https://x.com/MichaelRLowry/status/1982643194988052600

4 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3996
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1144 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:04 pm

Stormgodess wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.


Noob question:

Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?

I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.

But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.

Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.


I'm sure the equipment is calibrated before and after every flight but it's quite a rough ride going into storms like this so equipment failure is always a real probability.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 623
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1145 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:04 pm

WaveBreaking wrote::double:

https://i.imgur.com/bPj86Np.gif


That uh, that escalated quickly.
2 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6242
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1146 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:05 pm

Stormgodess wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.


Noob question:

Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?

I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.

But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.

Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.

I can’t speak for the mods, but I don’t think this is an unreasonable question that would require removal.

That said, I’m confident that if the equipment on these flights were miscalibrated, there would be distinct signs. Considering that there are often two planes simultaneously flying through this storm, each dropping dropsondes, you would see notable discrepancies between the plane readings and their respective dropsondes as they overlap each other’s territory. None of that has been seen in any flights in this storm’s existence though.
3 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2566
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1147 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:06 pm

Melissa is over 90 degree F (32 C) water right now, may be partly why it's blowing up so much right now. (Lightning around the core is off the charts right now)
Image
7 likes   

Keldeo1997
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1148 Postby Keldeo1997 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:11 pm

Image

Holy
11 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148596
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1149 Postby cycloneye » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:13 pm

Who is going to stay up and post the overnight Air Force mission? Maybe an historic one?

https://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 0#p3144680
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1150 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:13 pm

I've been watching Melissa the whole day, but of course it started flexing a full -80C/CDG ring just when I went away for half an hour. If the next recon still finds nothing above 125 kt... I'd be speechless.

ATDoel wrote:I’m surprised no one has mentioned its forward speed(or lack of) as one of the factors why the wind speed is relatively low. A hurricanes stronger side is the side with a positive movement vector, the movement of the storm adds to the windspeed. If Melissa was moving 15 MPH, it would likely be a cat 5.

This explains the wind speed but not the pressure, though.

Travorum wrote:There's no mention of any sort of ERC in the 03z advisory, meld or otherwise, completed or not. As for the SW motion over the past few hours, the NHC thinks this won't have a significant impact on track in the long run:

Although the eye wobbled a bit to the south recently, this is
believed to be temporary and a more representative initial motion
estimate is about 270/4 kt. The track forecast reasoning is
essentially unchanged from the previous advisory.


They also mention peak FL winds supporting 125kts at the surface, despite even the recent FL winds themselves not being above 125kts. Maybe they're referencing the 129kt FL/132kt SFMR winds from the earlier AF recon flight even though they reference the NOAA mission? I'm not quite sure here. The AF recon mission found a SFMR/FL wind combo that supported 125kts but the most recent NOAA mission did not.

A NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft has been
investigating the system ... and peak flight-level winds
support an intensity of 125 kt

My guess is that NHC didn't want to explicitly lower the intensity given the landfall threat. In the TCR, I suspect that both the initial Cat 4 upgrade (where the 120 kt was solely based on satellite) and the intensity since the "unofficial eyewall meld" would be lowered.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Last edited by Teban54 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4305
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle and Phoenix

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1151 Postby Category5Kaiju » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:14 pm

Looks like Melissa’s about to make a real sprint towards Category 5 now.
4 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
Stormgodess
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 316
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1152 Postby Stormgodess » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:14 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
Stormgodess wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Let's see if the next overnight mission has winds up and the pressure down. Air Force plane departs at 11:15 PM EDT.


Noob question:

Can we have total confidence in equipment and readings at all times right now? Are the instruments maintained, calibrated, replaced regularly? Does gov shut down or department restructuring affect any of these types of services?

I'm a non academic here, actually I'm a total moron, and if this sort of question is frowned upon, please remove.

But off and on the past few days I've seen mention of equipment issues. I can't pinpoint specific issues because as I said I'm a moron and it was in one ear, right out the other type of thing.

Its a question that has crossed my mind several times over the years but keep forgetting to ask.

I can’t speak for the mods, but I don’t think this is an unreasonable question that would require removal.

That said, I’m confident that if the equipment on these flights were miscalibrated, there would be distinct signs. Considering that there are often two planes simultaneously flying through this storm, each dropping dropsondes, you would see notable discrepancies between the plane readings and their respective dropsondes as they overlap each other’s territory. None of that has been seen in any flights in this storm’s existence though.


Thank you to you and eastcoast both. Not having the first clue of how this type of equipment is calibrated/maintained, how difficult, or what the cost is... I just wasnt sure.

And yes I can see how having the second dataset from another plane to compare against, would be helpful. I had never thought of that.

Thank you both so much :D
4 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3996
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1153 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:15 pm

5 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 623
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1154 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:18 pm

ADT Raw T# has hit 8.0 with the recent convective blowup, and the CI# is up to 7.4/152kt, despite actual intensity likely steady around 125kt. I'd also assess Dvorak intensity subjectively at T7.5/155kts from the CMG ring being >0.5 deg latitude, and this assessment is probably 30kts too high. It's an incredible discrepancy even given the late season tropopause height.

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 27 OCT 2025 Time : 024021 UTC
Lat : 16:15:00 N Lon : 77:26:59 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
7.4 / 908.3mb/152.0kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.4 8.0 8.0

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 16 km

Center Temp : +19.1C Cloud Region Temp : -78.5C
3 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10180
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1155 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:21 pm

This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is. :spam: Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.

But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities. ;)
8 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1156 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:24 pm

This feels like an Eta recon pass all over again. Lol. Cold CDO isn't everything folks. Late season Dvorak can be misleading.
3 likes   

zhukm29
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1157 Postby zhukm29 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:25 pm

Image

Best looking Cat 4 I have to say :lol: really shows the limitations of Dvorak in late season.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148596
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1158 Postby cycloneye » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:26 pm

2 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1159 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:26 pm

This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.

A few differences from Melissa, however:
  • Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
  • Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
  • Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.

Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
Last edited by Teban54 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
8 likes   

zzzh
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:13 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1160 Postby zzzh » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:26 pm

FLpanhandle91 wrote:This feels like an Eta recon pass all over again. Lol. Cold CDO isn't everything folks. Late season Dvorak can be misleading.

Eta clearly had an EWRC when recon arrived and its pinhole wasn't stable at all. That is not the case here
3 likes   


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests