NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3972
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1161 Postby eastcoastFL » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:15 pm

5 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1162 Postby Travorum » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:18 pm

ADT Raw T# has hit 8.0 with the recent convective blowup, and the CI# is up to 7.4/152kt, despite actual intensity likely steady around 125kt. I'd also assess Dvorak intensity subjectively at T7.5/155kts from the CMG ring being >0.5 deg latitude, and this assessment is probably 30kts too high. It's an incredible discrepancy even given the late season tropopause height.

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 27 OCT 2025 Time : 024021 UTC
Lat : 16:15:00 N Lon : 77:26:59 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
7.4 / 908.3mb/152.0kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.4 8.0 8.0

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 16 km

Center Temp : +19.1C Cloud Region Temp : -78.5C
3 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10055
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1163 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:21 pm

This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is. :spam: Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.

But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities. ;)
8 likes   

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1036
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1164 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:24 pm

This feels like an Eta recon pass all over again. Lol. Cold CDO isn't everything folks. Late season Dvorak can be misleading.
3 likes   

zhukm29
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1165 Postby zhukm29 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:25 pm

Image

Best looking Cat 4 I have to say :lol: really shows the limitations of Dvorak in late season.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148154
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1166 Postby cycloneye » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:26 pm

2 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3628
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1167 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:26 pm

This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.

A few differences from Melissa, however:
  • Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
  • Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
  • Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.

Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
Last edited by Teban54 on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
8 likes   

zzzh
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 993
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:13 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1168 Postby zzzh » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:26 pm

FLpanhandle91 wrote:This feels like an Eta recon pass all over again. Lol. Cold CDO isn't everything folks. Late season Dvorak can be misleading.

Eta clearly had an EWRC when recon arrived and its pinhole wasn't stable at all. That is not the case here
3 likes   

Tekken_Guy
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:08 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1169 Postby Tekken_Guy » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:30 pm

Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?
3 likes   

Hurricane Mike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1170 Postby Hurricane Mike » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:30 pm

0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2557
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1171 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:33 pm

It appears that the southerly jog has stopped, and wobbling the other direction now.
Image
Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10055
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1172 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:36 pm

Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?



If the wind can catch up to appearance. I think it is possible. We'll probably wake up at 8am est to its peak! Haf-a and b suggest that this thing may become 150-155 knots tomarrow and up to landfall on Jamaica. We will see.
3 likes   

Fancy1002
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:47 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1173 Postby Fancy1002 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:39 pm

The northwest section of the storm seems to continuously be the weakest or most unstable, I wonder why that is?
0 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3628
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1174 Postby Teban54 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:40 pm

Tekken_Guy wrote:Can Melissa make a real play for strongest of the season? Or even sub-900?

Goalposts, Atlantic and worldwide in 2025:

  • Humberto: 140 kt, 924 mb
  • Errol (Australian region, JTWC): 140 kt, 919 mb
  • Erin: 140 kt, 915 mb
  • Ragasa (JTWC): 145 kt, 910 mb
  • Ragasa (JMA): 905 mb (10-min wind 110 kt)
For the strongest of the Atlantic season, Melissa just needs to get to 145 kt (beyond "minimum Cat 5") to top Erin in wind speed. Pressure lower than 915 mb will be harder, but HAFS-A and HAFS-B do show this happening -- if not now, there's an arguably better chance just before Jamaica landfall.

Sub-905 to surpass Ragasa can be a stretch, though Melissa still has a fair chance to succeed.
4 likes   

User avatar
Woofde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:33 am

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1175 Postby Woofde » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:41 pm

Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.

A few differences from Melissa, however:
  • Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
  • Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
  • Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.

Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.
4 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10055
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: RE: Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1176 Postby Sciencerocks » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:51 pm

Woofde wrote:
Teban54 wrote:This is a good time for a reminder that Eta 2020 had similarly high Raw T (8.3?), but recon only found 130 kt / 922 mb.

A few differences from Melissa, however:
  • Eta's eye never cleared out nearly as much (which led to the hypothesis that eye temperature was a more reliable indicator, especially when compared to Goni a few days before). But Melissa's eye is now among the warmest and smoothest in this basin.
  • Technically, Eta's Final T never rose to a level that would significantly exceed its actual intensity, due to constraints. But Melissa had been at Final T 7.0+ for a day now, and may even have time to catch up before the next recon arrives. It's much more direct evidence that ADT can and do run too high (as are all other satellite estimates).
  • Eta's recon coverage was spotty all day due to equipment problems, leading to high expectations before the said flight finally made it into the storm. Melissa's recon has been excellent, and we already know ADT's mismatch all day.

Regardless, with Melissa already at 933 mb before the recent developments, it's very likely to exceed Eta's intensity at the minimum.
If its taking on this appearance at 930mb, how would it look at 890mb? Would we need to use a different scale? These late season systems are fascinating.



Sometimes it takes time for the wind to catch up with the appearance. This impressive satellite structure with the lightening within the eye wall suggest that the wind will be forced closer to the surface.
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1177 Postby Hurricane2022 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:51 pm

3 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5740
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1178 Postby chaser1 » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:55 pm

Working all afternoon & evening with hardly a chance to catch up with the days recon data, Discussion updates and satellite analysis has been torturous, but from what I'm seeing might be perfect timing to sit back and watch. I know a number of you guys have already expressed this but..... right here - right now, there is no way that Melissa is not a Cat 5. Where's the Air Force plane? I'll eat my underwear if I'm wrong :ggreen:
4 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2557
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1179 Postby BobHarlem » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:57 pm

Jamaica radar loop update. Back to a North of due west jog here.

Image
Last edited by BobHarlem on Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes   

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1452
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1180 Postby Jr0d » Sun Oct 26, 2025 10:58 pm

Sciencerocks wrote:This is the most impressive cat4 I've ever seen and most amazingly the recon says that is what it is. :spam: Can't argue with direct measurement but it is a puzzle of ones mind.

But I will stay up another 3-4 hours to catch at least a pass to see if current satellite trends finally catch up with surface realities. ;)


I am definitely staying up to see what recon finds.

It does seem like low latitude storms are not as strong as the satellite suggests, where as higher lattitude storms can be stronger than the satellite estimates. Maybe that is my recency bias or maybe there is some mechanism like the Coriolis effect being stronger as latitude increases.

That said, I will be amazed if recon does not find a stronger storm if the eyewall holds together until they get a pass. I am thinking we will see the pressure down to the low 920s.
5 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ScottNAtlanta, Teban54 and 139 guests