NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3853
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1501 Postby mrbagyo » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:54 am

905.6 extrap
161 FL
7 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2843
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1502 Postby kevin » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:55 am

Wow, still deepening! 905.6 mb extrapolated pressure, 161 kt peak FL wind.
6 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 242
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1503 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:56 am

kevin wrote:Wow, still deepening! 905.6 mb extrapolated pressure, 161 kt peak FL wind.


Not what I was expecting to see after that 5 hPa rise in central pressure between the last two passes. Still deepening & FL winds continuing to pick up!
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1504 Postby Hurricane2022 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:57 am

Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours. 8-)
6 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8992
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1505 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:58 am

905.6mb extrap. Between its continued deepening and the 155+ kt FL winds and 160+ kt SFMR, I think it warrants an upgrade to 150 kt.
8 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1506 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:58 am

mrbagyo wrote:905.6 extrap
161 FL


At this rate there is room for sub-900 before landfall.
1 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10244
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1507 Postby Blown Away » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am

TallyTracker wrote:
tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.


There is a non-zero chance of that happening. It’s unlikely and Jamaica should not plan on that. But Cuba should be prepping for at least a Cat 4 hit in case it misses Jamaica and does not weaken as much as anticipated.


The track has shifted W slightly over past few advisories, it would take a @35 mile wobble W to miss Jamaica with the core. Very unlikely at this point, but it wouldn't take much IMO.
Last edited by Blown Away on Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34184
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1508 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am

aspen wrote:905.6mb extrap. Between its continued deepening and the 155+ kt FL winds and 160+ kt SFMR, I think it warrants an upgrade to 150 kt.


Agreed with 150 kt now, especially if a dropsonde can confirm such.
5 likes   

Pelicane
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2022 1:52 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1509 Postby Pelicane » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am

Both of the HAFS models peak this on Tuesday morning. Melissa is already stronger than what those models are showing tomorrow so who knows where the bottom is.
6 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 242
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1510 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:01 am

Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours. 8-)


Given the steep deepening trend on this flight & the fact that satellite estimates remain well above Melissa's observed intensity (T7.7 ADT, T7.5 subjective at time of writing), the NHC may be more willing to raise their 18z/21z intensity estimates during the gap. It seems clear at this point that Melissa "intends" to catch up to her appearance.
1 likes   

ATDoel
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:02 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1511 Postby ATDoel » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:02 am

Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours. 8-)


I'll never understand why they send in two planes at the same time yet have 8 hour gaps between center fixes. 8 hours between flights is absurd in a situation like this.
3 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2565
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1512 Postby BobHarlem » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:03 am

tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.

unfortunately that's not going to happen, it's pretty much on the NHC track (since 5pm yesterday's).
2 likes   

Keldeo1997
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1513 Postby Keldeo1997 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:03 am

8 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3654
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1514 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:05 am

Pelicane wrote:Both of the HAFS models peak this on Tuesday morning. Melissa is already stronger than what those models are showing tomorrow so who knows where the bottom is.

One caveat -- as I mentioned in the models thread:

Teban54 wrote:On the other hand, IIRC it's not uncommon for the intensities and timings of 1st and 2nd peaks on hurricane models to be "flipped". When Milton formed, the hurricane models generally forecasted its second peak to be stronger than the first. That didn't verify: the actual intensities were 895/155 for the first peak, 902/145 for the second.
4 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8992
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1515 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:05 am

Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours. 8-)

I don’t get why they scheduled such long gaps in coverage for most days. Yesterday’s schedule with AF taking off just as NOAA left Melissa was a lot better and reduced the gap in coverage. 8 hours is too much for a system within 24 hours of landfall; it should be getting as little gaps as possible.
6 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3853
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1516 Postby mrbagyo » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:06 am

Travorum wrote:
TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.


I'm really concerned about Melissa potentially making landfall near Treasure Beach. There are populated areas immediately east of there that are on cliffs 400m tall right near the coast that would be in the right front quadrant eyewall, and we saw from the dropsondes earlier what the winds look like 400m up.


It would look similar to this (elevated part of Dinadiawan, Aurora in the aftermath of Typhoon Manyi last year - this was an absolutely lush green jungle before the typhoon that you cant even see the coast due to vegetation)
Image
3 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

Hurricane Mike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1517 Postby Hurricane Mike » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:06 am

0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1518 Postby Hurricane2022 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:07 am

5 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5751
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1519 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:08 am

tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.


Nope. On its current track, it would probably hit Belize...... in about 2-weeks :lol: The odds of that happening are probably less likely then winning the lottery - while getting struck by lightning at the same time.
3 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1520 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:10 am

aspen wrote:
Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours. 8-)

I don’t get why they scheduled such long gaps in coverage for most days. Yesterday’s schedule with AF taking off just as NOAA left Melissa was a lot better and reduced the gap in coverage. 8 hours is too much for a system within 24 hours of landfall; it should be getting as little gaps as possible.


I have to remind myself not to tear my hair out in frustration in moments like this. Otherwise I’d be bald by Thanksgiving every year and that would be some frightening pictures.
3 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kronotsky and 147 guests