NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3853
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
905.6 extrap
161 FL
161 FL
7 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Wow, still deepening! 905.6 mb extrapolated pressure, 161 kt peak FL wind.
6 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
kevin wrote:Wow, still deepening! 905.6 mb extrapolated pressure, 161 kt peak FL wind.
Not what I was expecting to see after that 5 hPa rise in central pressure between the last two passes. Still deepening & FL winds continuing to pick up!
2 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours. 
6 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
905.6mb extrap. Between its continued deepening and the 155+ kt FL winds and 160+ kt SFMR, I think it warrants an upgrade to 150 kt.
8 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
-
MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
- Category 1

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
mrbagyo wrote:905.6 extrap
161 FL
At this rate there is room for sub-900 before landfall.
1 likes
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25
- Blown Away
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 10244
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
TallyTracker wrote:tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.
There is a non-zero chance of that happening. It’s unlikely and Jamaica should not plan on that. But Cuba should be prepping for at least a Cat 4 hit in case it misses Jamaica and does not weaken as much as anticipated.
The track has shifted W slightly over past few advisories, it would take a @35 mile wobble W to miss Jamaica with the core. Very unlikely at this point, but it wouldn't take much IMO.
Last edited by Blown Away on Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…
-
CrazyC83
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 34184
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
aspen wrote:905.6mb extrap. Between its continued deepening and the 155+ kt FL winds and 160+ kt SFMR, I think it warrants an upgrade to 150 kt.
Agreed with 150 kt now, especially if a dropsonde can confirm such.
5 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Both of the HAFS models peak this on Tuesday morning. Melissa is already stronger than what those models are showing tomorrow so who knows where the bottom is.
6 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours.
Given the steep deepening trend on this flight & the fact that satellite estimates remain well above Melissa's observed intensity (T7.7 ADT, T7.5 subjective at time of writing), the NHC may be more willing to raise their 18z/21z intensity estimates during the gap. It seems clear at this point that Melissa "intends" to catch up to her appearance.
1 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours.
I'll never understand why they send in two planes at the same time yet have 8 hour gaps between center fixes. 8 hours between flights is absurd in a situation like this.
3 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.
unfortunately that's not going to happen, it's pretty much on the NHC track (since 5pm yesterday's).
2 likes
-
Keldeo1997
- Category 2

- Posts: 676
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Pelicane wrote:Both of the HAFS models peak this on Tuesday morning. Melissa is already stronger than what those models are showing tomorrow so who knows where the bottom is.
One caveat -- as I mentioned in the models thread:
Teban54 wrote:On the other hand, IIRC it's not uncommon for the intensities and timings of 1st and 2nd peaks on hurricane models to be "flipped". When Milton formed, the hurricane models generally forecasted its second peak to be stronger than the first. That didn't verify: the actual intensities were 895/155 for the first peak, 902/145 for the second.
4 likes
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours.
I don’t get why they scheduled such long gaps in coverage for most days. Yesterday’s schedule with AF taking off just as NOAA left Melissa was a lot better and reduced the gap in coverage. 8 hours is too much for a system within 24 hours of landfall; it should be getting as little gaps as possible.
6 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- mrbagyo
- Category 5

- Posts: 3853
- Age: 33
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
- Location: 14.13N 120.98E
- Contact:
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
Travorum wrote:TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.
I'm really concerned about Melissa potentially making landfall near Treasure Beach. There are populated areas immediately east of there that are on cliffs 400m tall right near the coast that would be in the right front quadrant eyewall, and we saw from the dropsondes earlier what the winds look like 400m up.
It would look similar to this (elevated part of Dinadiawan, Aurora in the aftermath of Typhoon Manyi last year - this was an absolutely lush green jungle before the typhoon that you cant even see the coast due to vegetation)

3 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.
-
Hurricane Mike
- Category 2

- Posts: 666
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:44 am
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
12pm Video Update
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgD5Qu4xXkM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgD5Qu4xXkM
0 likes
- Hurricane2022
- Category 5

- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
- Location: Araçatuba, Brazil
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
5 likes
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.
--------
ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.
Nope. On its current track, it would probably hit Belize...... in about 2-weeks
3 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
TallyTracker
- Category 2

- Posts: 779
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm
Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion
aspen wrote:Hurricane2022 wrote:Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours.
I don’t get why they scheduled such long gaps in coverage for most days. Yesterday’s schedule with AF taking off just as NOAA left Melissa was a lot better and reduced the gap in coverage. 8 hours is too much for a system within 24 hours of landfall; it should be getting as little gaps as possible.
I have to remind myself not to tear my hair out in frustration in moments like this. Otherwise I’d be bald by Thanksgiving every year and that would be some frightening pictures.
3 likes
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24
Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests








