NATL: MELISSA - Aftermath - Discussion: Josh Morgerman video of Melissa is up

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 623
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1481 Postby Travorum » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:38 am

TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.


I'm really concerned about Melissa potentially making landfall near Treasure Beach. There are populated areas immediately east of there that are on cliffs 400m tall right near the coast that would be in the right front quadrant eyewall, and we saw from the dropsondes earlier what the winds look like 400m up.
Last edited by Travorum on Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5760
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1482 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:39 am

Travorum wrote:
chaser1 wrote:Just curious but does anyone happen to know where the Island's primary electrical infrastructure/production centers are located? I would assume relative proximity to Kingston but that's just a guess


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_Jamaica

I found this list for production, It looks like by capacity most production infrastructure is located in the two parishes to the west of Kingston (St Catherine and Clarendon), with some capacity in Kingston itself. There are also a few notable production facilities up near Montego Bay. There are several wind farms and a hydroelectric plant near where Melissa is more likely to make landfall in St Elizabeth parish, they produce a little over 100MW combined.


Interesting stuff, thanks. Well, it's possible that the storms core might impact Jamaica's west end more directly and that wouldn't bode well for their Montego Bay power facilities (and especially bad for their tourism industry). Still, it appears that the greater part of their power grid is further east and closer to Kingston. Hopefully that area will be spared the worst wind. Sadly, the storm surge impact there will be extreme. That'll further exacerbate the destruction of their Barge Power facilities near and just east of Kingston. Short of some westward shift miracle, all in all this is going to be a tragic disaster.

Furthermore, where significant elevation changes may provide protection from storm surge and flooding from rainfall, only increases the risk of higher winds with height. I wonder what extent of the high population areas are modernized to the extent of providing high groun with good stablished drainage regions with facilities that ideally would have or be connected to underground electric? Better yet, underground emergency facilities or basement-like shelters.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

ATDoel
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:02 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1483 Postby ATDoel » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:41 am

TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.
I don't believe many, if any, of their homes are stick built so that should really help. There's going to be missing roofs but I don't think we'll see an extensive number of homes swept off their foundation from wind like you would in a severe tornado. Now the mudslides and surge on the other hand.....
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5760
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1484 Postby chaser1 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:43 am

ScottNAtlanta wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:I just looked, and there are 202 guests on this thread...wow


Perhaps Bing [BOT] & Google [BOT] brought all their [BOT] friends :cheesy:

Well...it's up to 353 now...that's a lotta bots


We're their analytical mosh pit :hehe:
2 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1485 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:43 am

ScottNAtlanta wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:I just looked, and there are 202 guests on this thread...wow


Perhaps Bing [BOT] & Google [BOT] brought all their [BOT] friends :cheesy:

Well...it's up to 353 now...that's a lotta bots

The thread got to 400 guests last night.
2 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 289
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1486 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:46 am

Lightning is still going wild in the eyewall despite signs that pressure has begun to fill in....I know "fluctuations in intensity" typically means gradual weakening following a high-end peak, but there might be time left for Melissa to rebound even if her intensity levels off or slips temporarily. She is, after all, officially forecast to stay around 145 kts for another 12 hours...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148596
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1487 Postby cycloneye » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:47 am

Here is a image that all have to archive and screenshot. The eye of Melissa from the NOAA plane that Andy Hazelton was as part of crew.

Image
11 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4305
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle and Phoenix

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1488 Postby Category5Kaiju » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:48 am

Also, Melissa is the first WCAR Category 5 hurricane we've had since 2007. Melissa pretty much meets the descriptions of the stereotypical "late-season WCAR monster" that wx enthusiasts constantly rave about. :lol:
6 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1128
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1489 Postby Michele B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:48 am



Does this loop look like Melissa is moving east, or is the orientation upside down??
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022, Milton - 2024

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 783
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1490 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:49 am

Travorum wrote:
TallyTracker wrote:This is going to be like a 50-mile wide tornado where it makes landfall. I’d be looking for a reinforced concrete building or underground basement (outside a flood zone). I’m concerned that their building codes no matter how much they may have improved after Gilbert are going to be no match for a storm of this caliber. Praying for the folks there to be safe.


I'm really concerned about Melissa potentially making landfall near Treasure Beach. There are populated areas immediately east of there that are on cliffs 400m tall right near the coast that would be in the right front quadrant eyewall, and we saw from the dropsondes earlier what the winds look like 400m up.


That crossed my mind as well. Few buildings can survive 200+ mph gusts at that height. If we had sensors up there it might rival Gustav’s record wind gust in Cuba.
1 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

ATDoel
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2025 8:02 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1491 Postby ATDoel » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:52 am

FLpanhandle91 wrote:https://fr24.com/TEAL76/3cd8177d

NE to SW pass incoming.


hopefully nothing but they disappeared off the tracker as soon as they hit the eyewall....
0 likes   

TallyTracker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 783
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1492 Postby TallyTracker » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:53 am

tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.


There is a non-zero chance of that happening. It’s unlikely and Jamaica should not plan on that. But Cuba should be prepping for at least a Cat 4 hit in case it misses Jamaica and does not weaken as much as anticipated.
7 likes   
Fran '96, Georges '98, Gordon '00, Gabrielle '01, Charley '04, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Barry '07, Fay '08, Debby '12, Matthew '16, Emily '17, Irma '17, Michael ‘18, Elsa ‘21, Fred ‘21, Mindy ‘21, Nicole ‘22, Idalia ‘23, Debby ‘24, Helene ‘24

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3962
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1493 Postby mrbagyo » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:54 am

905.6 extrap
161 FL
7 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2878
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1494 Postby kevin » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:55 am

Wow, still deepening! 905.6 mb extrapolated pressure, 161 kt peak FL wind.
6 likes   

User avatar
sasha_B
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 289
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 4:32 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1495 Postby sasha_B » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:56 am

kevin wrote:Wow, still deepening! 905.6 mb extrapolated pressure, 161 kt peak FL wind.


Not what I was expecting to see after that 5 hPa rise in central pressure between the last two passes. Still deepening & FL winds continuing to pick up!
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane2022
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1958
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2022 11:38 pm
Location: Araçatuba, Brazil

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1496 Postby Hurricane2022 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:57 am

Melissa continues to strengthen. And to the delight of all of us, the next recon penetration of Melissa's eye will be in only 8 hours. 8-)
6 likes   
Sorry for the bad English sometimes...!
For reliable and detailed information for any meteorological phenomenon, please consult the National Hurricane Center, Joint Typhoon Warning Center , or your local Meteo Center.

--------

ECCE OMNIA NOVA FACIAM (Ap 21,5).

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9042
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1497 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:58 am

905.6mb extrap. Between its continued deepening and the 155+ kt FL winds and 160+ kt SFMR, I think it warrants an upgrade to 150 kt.
8 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1498 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:58 am

mrbagyo wrote:905.6 extrap
161 FL


At this rate there is room for sub-900 before landfall.
1 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10253
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1499 Postby Blown Away » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am

TallyTracker wrote:
tulum07 wrote:With the current track, looks like Jamaica will avoid landfall. Next stop, Cuba instead.


There is a non-zero chance of that happening. It’s unlikely and Jamaica should not plan on that. But Cuba should be prepping for at least a Cat 4 hit in case it misses Jamaica and does not weaken as much as anticipated.


The track has shifted W slightly over past few advisories, it would take a @35 mile wobble W to miss Jamaica with the core. Very unlikely at this point, but it wouldn't take much IMO.
Last edited by Blown Away on Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34308
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1500 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:00 am

aspen wrote:905.6mb extrap. Between its continued deepening and the 155+ kt FL winds and 160+ kt SFMR, I think it warrants an upgrade to 150 kt.


Agreed with 150 kt now, especially if a dropsonde can confirm such.
5 likes   


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests