NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

Current storms and invests:

Moderators: hurricanetrack, S2k Moderators


The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1981 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:09 pm

ScottNAtlanta wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:The top 10 most intense storms now:

1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905


Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing

I told ya'll a couple of days ago I was moving the "I" curse to "M" :double:

As I analyzed here earlier today, the M curse is actually more saliant during the most recent active streak (2016-2025) than the I curse. Five M names were retired (or almost certainly will) -- averaging one every other year -- while "only" three I names were:

Image

Some more discussions in this comment.
5 likes   

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1468
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1982 Postby Jr0d » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:10 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
aspen wrote:Odd eyewall drop. Winds drop from 140 kt to 122 kt right above the surface, then pick up to 160+ kt by the 919mb level.


Also over 190 kt a few hundred feet above the surface. If that can penetrate down...


While the mountains of Jamaica will disrupt the eyewall, they are also high enough to see some of those 180kt+ winds if Melissa maintains the eyewall until landfall.

Not a good situation and I hope those in Jamaica are taking their final precautions before impact. I am also worried that some of these lesser experienced 'storm chasers' will put themselves in harm way in hopes of getting socual media clout.
2 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15507
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1983 Postby NDG » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:10 pm

2 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34286
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1984 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:10 pm

wx98 wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:The top 10 most intense storms now:

1) Wilma - 882
2) Gilbert - 888
3) 1935 Labor Day - 892
4) Milton - 895
4) Rita - 895
6) Allen - 899
7) Camille - 900
8) Katrina - 902
9) Melissa - 903
10) Dean - 905
10) Mitch - 905


Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing


Weird that despite the “I” curse, there’s no I storms here and 3 M storms.


Strongest of the "I" storms was Ivan at 910 mb, followed by Irma at 914 mb.
6 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1985 Postby Travorum » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:11 pm

Not that it really means anything practical for intensity when we have recon actively in the storm, but ADT Raw T# and Adj T# has hit the forbidden 8.6:

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 28 OCT 2025 Time : 024020 UTC
Lat : 16:35:24 N Lon : 78:32:24 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
8.3 / 878.5mb/179.0kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
8.3 8.6 8.6

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 14 km

Center Temp : +19.3C Cloud Region Temp : -81.2C
12 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5439
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1986 Postby Nimbus » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:12 pm

Headed north now.
Will have to shift NNE before landfall or eye will pass directly over Montego Bay.
There is a southern coastal town that would take the strong eyewall in that scenario.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category5Kaiju
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4259
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1987 Postby Category5Kaiju » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:13 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
wx98 wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing


Weird that despite the “I” curse, there’s no I storms here and 3 M storms.


Strongest of the "I" storms was Ivan at 910 mb, followed by Irma at 914 mb.


"I"s are infamous for being destructive and strong (with several powerful members), but the "M"s are the true titans of the Atlantic.
3 likes   
Unless explicitly stated, all info in my posts is based on my own opinions and observations. Tropical storms and hurricanes can be extremely dangerous. Do not think you can beat Mother Nature. Refer to an accredited weather research agency or meteorologist if you need to make serious decisions regarding an approaching storm.

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2535
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1988 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:13 pm

THE M CURSE

Image
5 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1989 Postby Teban54 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:13 pm


Google DeepMind has really, really nailed Melissa. It's one of the most difficult forecasts of recent times (if not ever), and it was pretty much the only one that had been consistently right on track and intensity.

NHC's discussions had repeatedly highlighted the GDM ensembles, at times even following their ensemble intensity to the point of issuing forecasts higher than all physics-based models (and yes, that included HAFS-A/B and HWRF at some point). That ended up verifying.
6 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15507
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1990 Postby NDG » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:14 pm

Jr0d wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
aspen wrote:Odd eyewall drop. Winds drop from 140 kt to 122 kt right above the surface, then pick up to 160+ kt by the 919mb level.


Also over 190 kt a few hundred feet above the surface. If that can penetrate down...


While the mountains of Jamaica will disrupt the eyewall, they are also high enough to see some of those 180kt+ winds if Melissa maintains the eyewall until landfall.

Not a good situation and I hope those in Jamaica are taking their final precautions before impact. I am also worried that some of these lesser experienced 'storm chasers' will put themselves in harm way in hopes of getting socual media clout.


I doubt the 2k-2.5k foot tall hills/mountains of western Jamaica will disrupt the eyewall that much compared to the 7k+ mountains in eastern Jamaica.
But I do agree with those hills will experience much higher winds like they did in Puerto Rico during Maria.
1 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9026
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1991 Postby aspen » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:14 pm

As if Melissa couldn’t get any more ludicrous, the eye looks to be warming and the CDG is thickening on Dvorak imagery. I’ll be very surprised if next pass doesn’t yield 898-900mb, or lower.
3 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 839
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1992 Postby HurricaneRyan » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:15 pm

ScottNAtlanta wrote:THE M CURSE

https://i.imgur.com/nHVZTh0.gif


LMFAO I love this. Great comedic relief.
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

Pelicane
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 190
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2022 1:52 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1993 Postby Pelicane » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:15 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:My god, I step away for like an hour and a half and come back to see the best Haiyan impression I’ve ever seen an Atlantic hurricane do. Melissa may “only” be the 9th most intense, but this has to be the most elite looking hurricane I’ve ever seen in this basin. Even the likes of Wilma, Gilbert, and Milton didn’t stand this tall imo.


Image

Image

I always thought Haiyan was the most insane looking storm I've ever seen on satellite. Melissa is not far behind at the moment.
Last edited by Pelicane on Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
6 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34286
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1994 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:15 pm

Teban54 wrote:
ScottNAtlanta wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing

I told ya'll a couple of days ago I was moving the "I" curse to "M" :double:

As I analyzed here earlier today, the M curse is actually more saliant during the most recent active streak (2016-2025) than the I curse. Five M names were retired (or almost certainly will) -- averaging one every other year -- while "only" three I names were:

https://i.imgur.com/m6XcCHa.png

Some more discussions in this comment.


Excellent analysis. It seems the I's have slowed down a bit, but yeah the M's are taking over. This will be a 4th generation name we move onto in 2031...especially in a year that, until late October, looked like we were going to get out of without any retirements (which was itself remarkable with two category 5's).
2 likes   

User avatar
galaxy401
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2444
Age: 30
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
Location: Casa Grande, Arizona

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1995 Postby galaxy401 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:16 pm

Happy 100 pages! Melissa celebrated by making the top 10 in most intense Atlantic hurricanes.

As some mentioned, the M storms have become very powerful hurricanes as well. The last 10 years has Matthew, Maria, Michael, Milton, and now Melissa.
2 likes   
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2727
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1996 Postby USTropics » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:16 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
wx98 wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:
Crazy how we have two "M" storms from two years in a row making the list. Guess the M curse is a thing


Weird that despite the “I” curse, there’s no I storms here and 3 M storms.


Strongest of the "I" storms was Ivan at 910 mb, followed by Irma at 914 mb.


I think the I storms are more synonymous with US landfalls. Maria, Melissa, Michelle, and Mitch (and really Matthew) are going to be/were devastating cyclones for the Caribbean/Central America.
4 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15507
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1997 Postby NDG » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:16 pm

Teban54 wrote:

Google DeepMind has really, really nailed Melissa. It's one of the most difficult forecasts of recent times (if not ever), and it was pretty much the only one that had been consistently right on track and intensity.

NHC's discussions had repeatedly highlighted the GDM ensembles, at times even following their ensemble intensity to the point of issuing forecasts higher than all physics-based models (and yes, that included HAFS-A/B and HWRF at some point). That ended up verifying.


It didn't do well at first before the system was formed/established showing it to head toward Hispaniola but once it had a firm LLC it did the best with the track.
1 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34286
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1998 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:17 pm

Next pass could at least move Melissa up above Allen, Camille and Katrina at this rate.
4 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2535
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1999 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:17 pm

I need to go to bed...I'm exhausted, been at this since 4am
edit...well one more pass wont hurt anything :eek:
Last edited by ScottNAtlanta on Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
REDHurricane
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 437
Age: 28
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:36 pm
Location: Northeast Pacific Ocean

Re: NATL: MELISSA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2000 Postby REDHurricane » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:17 pm

Hurricane models have Melissa strengthening up until landfall -- if that holds true we maaaaaybe could get in the ballpark of Wilma. Maybe.
4 likes   


Return to “Active Storms/Invests - Atlantic/EastPAC/CentralPAC/MED”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests