TS Ernesto Analysis,Sat Pics,Models Thread 6
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38106
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
TS Ernesto Analysis,Sat Pics,Models Thread 6
Thread 1 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88466
Thread 2 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88600
Thread 3 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 27&start=0
Thread 4 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 49&start=0
Thread 5 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88695
Thread 2 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88600
Thread 3 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 27&start=0
Thread 4 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 49&start=0
Thread 5 http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88695
Last edited by Brent on Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
#neversummer
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
I'm not saying one way or the other for sure, but this is looking more and more like it has its eyes on Mexico, not to mention the fact that the last discussion said that track changes may need to be adjusted on the next update, and I"m assuming adjusting it westward, as they commented on the ridge building in the central gulf. This may be fantastic news for the Gulf states!!
0 likes
- bvigal
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2276
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: British Virgin Islands
- Contact:
Chatting, chatting, chatting!! Katrina, work schedules, vacations, media, etc. don't belong in this thread. ANALYSIS, SAT PICS, MODELS. Please post speculations (versus fact-based analysis) about future track to thread titled
"Ok folks.. Place your bets.. where's #5 going?"
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88653
"Ok folks.. Place your bets.. where's #5 going?"
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=88653
0 likes
ConvergenceZone wrote:I'm not saying one way or the other for sure, but this is looking more and more like it has its eyes on Mexico, not to mention the fact that the last discussion said that track changes may need to be adjusted on the next update, and I"m assuming adjusting it westward, as they commented on the ridge building in the central gulf. This may be fantastic news for the Gulf states!!
Yes, indeed.
Best case (besides dissapating which seems less likely) is a trip west to Mexico which it sounds like is becoming more and more an option.
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
- skysummit
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5305
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Ponchatoula, LA
- Contact:
Aquawind wrote:Give me a VDM and then we can talk path..
Yea, no joke! How about we stop talking about potential landfalls and talk about what's presently going on. People are saying Mexico because the models shifted west again. Well, guess what....the models will likely shift east again. Heck, they might even turn northeast toward Florida later, who knows! Bottom line, it's way too early to tell, but at least we do know it'll be in the Carribean for the next day or two.
0 likes
- jasons2k
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 8245
- Age: 51
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
Looking at the visibles, there's little doubt in my mind when recon arrives they will find the LLC has relocated under the convection and we'll have a healthy TS. The outflow is improving and the west side of the storm is less elongated than earlier (it's more symmetrical). It appears to be wrapping-up nicely.
0 likes
- Lowpressure
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2032
- Age: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
skysummit wrote:Aquawind wrote:Give me a VDM and then we can talk path..
Yea, no joke! How about we stop talking about potential landfalls and talk about what's presently going on. People are saying Mexico because the models shifted west again. Well, guess what....the models will likely shift east again. Heck, they might even turn northeast toward Florida later, who knows! Bottom line, it's way too early to tell, but at least we do know it'll be in the Carribean for the next day or two.
Maybe we should worry about JAMAICA first.
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
skysummit wrote:Aquawind wrote:Give me a VDM and then we can talk path..
Yea, no joke! How about we stop talking about potential landfalls and talk about what's presently going on. People are saying Mexico because the models shifted west again. Well, guess what....the models will likely shift east again. Heck, they might even turn northeast toward Florida later, who knows! Bottom line, it's way too early to tell, but at least we do know it'll be in the Carribean for the next day or two.
sky, what I'm saying isn't based upon the models, it's based upon the latest discussion from the NHC, besides speculation is fun

0 likes
- Blown Away
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 10162
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am
Good point w/ the political pressure associated with the >96 hour tracks. But maybe TD5 is slowing considerably, the 5am had it moving at 20mph, the 11am has it moving at 15mph and said the center may actually be S and E of that position, which tells me the it would be less than 15mph. I know they predicted TD5 to slow over the next day, but it appears pretty significant slowing from 20 mph.
0 likes
ConvergenceZone wrote:I'm not saying one way or the other for sure, but this is looking more and more like it has its eyes on Mexico, not to mention the fact that the last discussion said that track changes may need to be adjusted on the next update, and I"m assuming adjusting it westward, as they commented on the ridge building in the central gulf. This may be fantastic news for the Gulf states!!
I think we should wait to see where recon finds the center this afternoon, before we say it's where it going to more likely than the other. I understand what TPC is doing not upgrading this storm to a TS yet, but I don't understand why a plane wasn't in this storm already this morning. Would of cleared up things sooner then waiting all day to find out.
0 likes
Not to bash the NHC, but I'm a bit puzzled as to why this wasn't upgraded to Ernesto at the 11AM EST advisory/discussion. This system is rather similar to Alberto in terms of LLC location relative to the main mass of convection and is more structurally organized than Alberto, as both are evidenced on this visible loop which indicates a possible LLC VERY close to the main convective mass, yet Alberto was upgraded under similar, or even less impressive, structure and synoptics, yet this was not. Even while being on the more conservative side, I still see rather plentiful divergence, banding, turning, and organization that strongly suggests an LLC very close to the main convective mass, as evidenced on visible and water vapor imagery. With convective bursts and gradual organization, I personally believe we may be looking at what may be already Ernesto. NOT bashing the NHC or disagreeing with their synopsis; however, it is still puzzling why, with this more substantial evidence, why we are not seeing Ernesto yet. Even waiting for RECON doesn't quite explain it in this case. It is also surprising why RECON hasn't gone in earlier.
0 likes
This is an extension from the other thread...just saw this question:
Dr Beven provided far more detail than I could have anyway...just basing the decision on how hard it was to locate the center and the contridictory information we have...typically the NHC will wait on something like this since recon is heading out anyway.
Besides...the question they answered is...what difference does it really make whether this gets named now or 6 hours from now?
MW
NONAME wrote:
MWatkins wrote:
Looks like we will not have a TS at 11AM...going to have to wait for recon which will fly in the next forecast cycle (this afternoon). I would guess they are waiting to see if the deep thunderstorms are over the center as opposed to sitting on the northeastern edge of it.
MW
What makes you come up to that conclusion.
Dr Beven provided far more detail than I could have anyway...just basing the decision on how hard it was to locate the center and the contridictory information we have...typically the NHC will wait on something like this since recon is heading out anyway.
Besides...the question they answered is...what difference does it really make whether this gets named now or 6 hours from now?
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
As I mentioned yesterday, TD5/Ernesto is slowing down.
The ULL should lift out and the high should build in over the WC.
We could see a major cane in three days!!
Question for the Mets, is it possible this storm becomes stationery
in the WC with weak steering currents? If so, all bets are off with
the future track.
The ULL should lift out and the high should build in over the WC.
We could see a major cane in three days!!
Question for the Mets, is it possible this storm becomes stationery
in the WC with weak steering currents? If so, all bets are off with
the future track.
0 likes
Power out all morning here. Just got our power back on. See #5 blew up with black-topped IR last night! Whew!
It is in a pulse down right now and probably changing gears in preparation for another ramp up. I don't think it is shear related. The 280*-285* course is keeping it under the worst shear. In fact I think the fast shear just to its north vented it - partly inducing the blow-up.
Real trouble down stream. This one has thick convection in the untapped Caribbean.
It is in a pulse down right now and probably changing gears in preparation for another ramp up. I don't think it is shear related. The 280*-285* course is keeping it under the worst shear. In fact I think the fast shear just to its north vented it - partly inducing the blow-up.
Real trouble down stream. This one has thick convection in the untapped Caribbean.
Last edited by Sanibel on Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
HURAKAN wrote:I would guess that since the RECON mission is just a few hours away from the storm, and the system is not a threat at the moment, and you are not sure of its surface structure, then it's logical to just wait to see what the RECON finds.
Yep... that's most likely the case. Still, under this circumstance and the points I mentioned above, it is still somewhat unusual that this was not bumped up to 35KT at 11AM EST.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, IsabelaWeather, LAF92, wileytheartist and 50 guests